Literature DB >> 18183922

Spoken word frequency counts based on 1.6 million words in American English.

Matrhew J Pastizzo1, Robert F Carbone.   

Abstract

Written word frequency (e.g., Francis & Ku6era, 1982; Kucera & Francis, 1967) constitutes apopular measure of word familiarity, which is highly predictive of word recognition. Far less often, researchers employ spoken frequency counts in their studies. This discrepancy can be attributed most readily to the conspicuous absence of a sizeable spoken frequency count for American English. The present article reports the construction of a 1.6-million-word spoken frequency database derived from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English (Simpson, Swales, & Briggs, 2002). We generated spoken frequency counts for 34,922 words and extracted speaker attributes from the source material to generate relative frequencies of words spoken by each speaker category. We assessthe predictive validity of these counts, and discuss some possible applications outside of word recognition studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18183922     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  8 in total

1.  Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.

Authors:  Francine Kohen; Gary Milsark; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Evaluating the Contribution of Executive Functions to Language Tasks in Cognitively Demanding Contexts.

Authors:  Jessica Obermeyer; Julie Schlesinger; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Remediation of language processing in aphasia: Improving activation and maintenance of linguistic representations in (verbal) short-term memory.

Authors:  Michelene Kalinyak-Fliszar; Francine Kohen; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs.

Authors:  Rachel I Mayberry; Matthew L Hall; Meghan Zvaigzne
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

6.  Assessment of linguistic and verbal short-term memory components of language abilities in aphasia.

Authors:  Nadine Martin; Irene Minkina; Francine P Kohen; Michelene Kalinyak-Fliszar
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.710

7.  Effect of Working Memory Load and Typicality on Semantic Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Jessica Obermeyer; Laura Reinert; Rachel Kamen; Danielle Pritchard; Hyejin Park; Nadine Martin
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Maintenance Versus Transmission Deficits: The Effect of Delay on Naming Performance in Aphasia.

Authors:  Nadine Martin; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.