PURPOSE: To compare left ventricular (LV) volume and mass assessment using two-dimensional (2D) cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) and k-t space broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) accelerated 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: On a commercially available 1.5T MR scanner, 2D cine SSFP, six- and eight-fold accelerated 3D k-t BLAST were performed to evaluate LV volumes and mass in 17 volunteers. After semiautomatic segmentation of the different MR data sets, the resulting volumes and mass were compared according to the mean difference, 95% confidence interval, standard deviation (SD), Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and the Pitman-Morgan test. RESULTS: Data acquisition was successful in all subjects. The number of required breathholds was reduced from a maximal of five for the 2D cine SSFP sequence to two for 3D k-t BLAST sequences. Comparing LV volumes, there was excellent agreement between 2D and 3D cine 8x k-t BLAST SSFP volumes (mean difference +/- 2SD end-diastolic volume [EDV] = 5 +/- 8 mL, end-systolic volume [ESV] = 1 +/-12 mL, and stroke volume [SV] = 3 +/- 8 mL), and mass (-1.8 +/- 9 g). CONCLUSION: k-t BLAST-accelerated 3D sequences allow accurate assessment of LV volumes and mass compared to 2D cine SSFP. This method may reduce costs and increase patient comfort due to shortened data acquisition time and reduced number of breathholds.
PURPOSE: To compare left ventricular (LV) volume and mass assessment using two-dimensional (2D) cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) and k-t space broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique (k-t BLAST) accelerated 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: On a commercially available 1.5T MR scanner, 2D cine SSFP, six- and eight-fold accelerated 3D k-t BLAST were performed to evaluate LV volumes and mass in 17 volunteers. After semiautomatic segmentation of the different MR data sets, the resulting volumes and mass were compared according to the mean difference, 95% confidence interval, standard deviation (SD), Pearson's correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and the Pitman-Morgan test. RESULTS: Data acquisition was successful in all subjects. The number of required breathholds was reduced from a maximal of five for the 2D cine SSFP sequence to two for 3D k-t BLAST sequences. Comparing LV volumes, there was excellent agreement between 2D and 3D cine 8x k-t BLAST SSFP volumes (mean difference +/- 2SD end-diastolic volume [EDV] = 5 +/- 8 mL, end-systolic volume [ESV] = 1 +/-12 mL, and stroke volume [SV] = 3 +/- 8 mL), and mass (-1.8 +/- 9 g). CONCLUSION: k-t BLAST-accelerated 3D sequences allow accurate assessment of LV volumes and mass compared to 2D cine SSFP. This method may reduce costs and increase patient comfort due to shortened data acquisition time and reduced number of breathholds.
Authors: Jing Liu; Li Feng; Hsin-Wei Shen; Chengcheng Zhu; Yan Wang; Kanae Mukai; Gabriel C Brooks; Karen Ordovas; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Clerio F Azevedo; Miguel A Rosário; Maria H R Siqueira; Victor Monsão; Manoj Saranathan; Thomas K Foo; Roberto Kalil Filho; Giovanni G Cerri; José A F Ramires Journal: Open Cardiovasc Med J Date: 2011-03-22
Authors: Anil K Attili; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Neil Maredia; Sebastian Kozerke; Abdul Larghat; Nik Abidin; John P Greenwood; Peter Boesiger; Sven Plein Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 5.364