Literature DB >> 18182919

The Parkland formula under fire: is the criticism justified?

Jennifer Blumetti1, John L Hunt, Brett D Arnoldo, Jennifer K Parks, Gary F Purdue.   

Abstract

Controversy has continued regarding the practicality and accuracy of the Parkland burn formula since its introduction over 35 years ago. The best guide for adequacy of resuscitation is urine output (UOP) per hour. A retrospective study of patients resuscitated with the Parkland formula was conducted to determine the accuracy (calculated vs. actual volume) based on UOP. A review of burn resuscitation from a single institution over 15 years was conducted. The Parkland formula was defined as fluid resuscitation of 3.7 to 4.3 ml/kg/% total body surface area (TBSA) burn in the first 24 hours. Adequate resuscitation was defined as UOP of 0.5 to 1.0 ml/kg/hr. Over-resuscitation was defined as UOP > 1.0 ml/kg/hr. Patients were stratified according to UOP. Burns more than 19% TBSA were included. Electrical burns, trauma, and children (<15 years) were excluded. Four hundred and eighty-three patients were reviewed. Forty-three percent (n = 210) received adequate resuscitation. Forty-eight percent (n = 233) received over-resuscitation. The mean fluid in the adequately and over-resuscitated groups was 5.8 and 6.1 ml/kg/%, respectively (P = .188). Mean TBSA and full thickness burns in the adequately and over-resuscitated groups were 38 and 43%, and 19 and 24%, respectively (P < .05). Inhalation injury was present in 12 and 18% (P = .1). Only 14% of adequately resuscitated and 12% of over-resuscitated patients met Parkland formula criteria. The mean Ivy index in the adequately and over-resuscitated groups was 216 and 259 ml/kg (P < .05). There was no significant difference in complication rates (80 vs. 82%) or mortality (14 vs. 17%). The actual burn resuscitation infrequently met the standard set forth by the Parkland formula. Patients commonly received fluid volumes higher than predicted by the Parkland formula. Emphasis should be placed not on calculated formula volumes, as these should represent the initial resuscitation volume only, but instead on parameters used to guide resuscitation. The Parkland formula only represents a resuscitation "starting" point. The UOP is the important parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18182919     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31815f5a62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  19 in total

1.  Burn resuscitation: is it straightforward or a challenge?

Authors:  S Hayek; A Ibrahim; G Abu Sittah; B Atiyeh
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2011-03-31

2.  Incidence, Cause and Treatment of Burn Casualties Under War Circumstances.

Authors:  Roelf S Breederveld; Wim E Tuinebreijer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Acute burn resuscitation and fluid creep: it is time for colloid rehabilitation.

Authors:  B S Atiyeh; S A Dibo; A E Ibrahim; E R Zgheib
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2012-06-30

4.  Optimized fluid management improves outcomes of pediatric burn patients.

Authors:  Robert Kraft; David N Herndon; Ludwik K Branski; Celeste C Finnerty; Katrina R Leonard; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Contributions of severe burn and disuse to bone structure and strength in rats.

Authors:  L A Baer; X Wu; J C Tou; E Johnson; S E Wolf; C E Wade
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Hold the Pendulum: Rates of Acute Kidney Injury are Increased in Patients Who Receive Resuscitation Volumes Less than Predicted by the Parkland Equation.

Authors:  Stephanie A Mason; Avery B Nathens; Celeste C Finnerty; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Brett D Arnoldo; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Increased B-type natriuretic peptide and decreased proteinuria might reflect decreased capillary leakage and is associated with a better outcome in patients with severe burns.

Authors:  Karina de Leeuw; Marianne K Nieuwenhuis; Anuschka S Niemeijer; Hans Eshuis; Gerard I J M Beerthuizen; Wilbert M Janssen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  A primer on burn resuscitation.

Authors:  Ferdinand K Bacomo; Kevin K Chung
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Burn resuscitation.

Authors:  Frederick W Endorf; David J Dries
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Harborview burns--1974 to 2009.

Authors:  Loren H Engrav; David M Heimbach; Frederick P Rivara; Kathleen F Kerr; Turner Osler; Tam N Pham; Sam R Sharar; Peter C Esselman; Eileen M Bulger; Gretchen J Carrougher; Shari Honari; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.