Literature DB >> 18182691

Effect of dose rate on the radiation-induced bystander response.

M D Gow1, C B Seymour, Soo-Hyun Byun, C E Mothersill.   

Abstract

Radiation-induced biological bystander effects have become a well-established phenomenon associated with the interaction of radiation with cells. These so-called bystander effects have been seen across a variety of end points for both high and low linear energy transfer (LET) radiations, utilizing a variety of dose rates and radiation sources. In this study, the effect of dose rate and different low LET sources on the bystander cell survival fraction (SF) was examined. The cell line investigated was the human keratinocyte HPV-G. The bystander response was measured via clonogenic assay after medium transfer protocol. Cells were irradiated using (60)Co gamma-rays and 20 MeV electrons at doses of 0.5, 5 and 10 Gy with varying dose rates. Both gamma and electron irradiation decreased recipient SF at 0.5 Gy and 5 Gy, respectively. Subsequent recovery of the SF to control levels for 10 Gy was observed. There was no dose rate dependence for (60)Co irradiation. A significant difference in the survival fraction was observed for electron irradiation at 10 Gy and a high dose rate. Furthermore, survival fractions were compared between (60)Co and 20 MeV electron irradiations. This showed a significant increase in the survival fraction 'recovery' at 10 Gy for a (60)Co dose rate of 1.1 Gy min(-1) compared to 20 MeV electrons at 1.0 Gy min(-1). No such difference was observed when comparing at higher dose rates. Lastly, increases in survival fraction at 10 Gy were abolished and the SF decreased by the plating of increased numbers of recipient cells. Such evidence may help gain insight into the nature and mechanism(s) surrounding bystander signal production, how these phenomena are tested and their eventual application in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18182691     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/1/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Joe M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Dose rate effects of low-LET ionizing radiation on fish cells.

Authors:  Nguyen T K Vo; Colin B Seymour; Carmel E Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Spatially fractionated radiation induces cytotoxicity and changes in gene expression in bystander and radiation adjacent murine carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi S Asur; Sunil Sharma; Ching-Wei Chang; Jose Penagaricano; Indira M Kommuru; Eduardo G Moros; Peter M Corry; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

5.  The cross-talk between Bax, Bcl2, caspases, and DNA damage in bystander HepG2 cells is regulated by γ-radiation dose and time of conditioned media transfer.

Authors:  Sharmi Mukherjee; Anindita Dutta; Anindita Chakraborty
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Dose calculations for [(131)i] meta-iodobenzylguanidine-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  M D Gow; C B Seymour; M Boyd; R J Mairs; W V Prestiwch; C E Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Identification of Key Proteins in Human Epithelial Cells Responding to Bystander Signals From Irradiated Trout Skin.

Authors:  Hayley Furlong; Richard Smith; Jiaxi Wang; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill; Orla Howe
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  The biological effect of large single doses: a possible role for non-targeted effects in cell inactivation.

Authors:  Marlon R Veldwijk; Bo Zhang; Frederik Wenz; Carsten Herskind
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of target and bystander cells in dose-response relationship of radiation-induced bystander effects in two cell lines.

Authors:  Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard; Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Ameneh Sazgarnia; Shokoufe Mohebbi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.