PURPOSE: Between May 1995 and August 2000 the Associazione Italiana di Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica conducted the ALL-95 study for risk-directed, Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) -oriented therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, aimed at exploring treatment reduction in standard-risk patients (SR) and intensification during continuation therapy in intermediate-risk patients (IR) as randomized questions and treatment intensification in high-risk patients (HR). The prognostic value of DNA index was explored in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,744 patients were enrolled (115, SR; 1,385, IR; and 244, HR). SR patients (DNA index >/= 1.16 and < 1.60; age, 1 to 5 years; and WBC < 20,000, non-T-immunophenotype, with no high-risk features) received a reduced induction therapy (no anthracyclines); IR patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive vincristine and dexamethasone pulses during maintenance; HR therapy was based on a conventional BFM schedule intensified with three chemotherapy blocks followed by a double reinduction phase. RESULTS: The event-free survival and overall survival probabilities at 10 years for the entire group were 72.5% (SE, 1.3) and 83.6% (SE, 0.9); 85.0% (SE, 3.4) and 95.5% (SE, 2.0) in SR, 75.1% (SE, 1.5) and 87.5% (SE, 0.9) in IR, and 51.0% (SE, 3.2) and 57.2% (SE, 3.3) in HR patients, respectively. Patients with a favorable DNA index had superior EFS in both IR (83.8% [2.7%] v 73.9% [1.7%]) and in HR (67.8% [9.4%] and 49.6% [3.5%]). Of the six patients with DNA index less than 0.8, only one remained in remission. CONCLUSION:Favorable DNA index was associated with a better prognosis in IR and HR patients defined by presenting clinical criteria and treatment with a BFM-oriented chemotherapy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Between May 1995 and August 2000 the Associazione Italiana di Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica conducted the ALL-95 study for risk-directed, Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) -oriented therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, aimed at exploring treatment reduction in standard-risk patients (SR) and intensification during continuation therapy in intermediate-risk patients (IR) as randomized questions and treatment intensification in high-risk patients (HR). The prognostic value of DNA index was explored in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,744 patients were enrolled (115, SR; 1,385, IR; and 244, HR). SR patients (DNA index >/= 1.16 and < 1.60; age, 1 to 5 years; and WBC < 20,000, non-T-immunophenotype, with no high-risk features) received a reduced induction therapy (no anthracyclines); IR patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive vincristine and dexamethasone pulses during maintenance; HR therapy was based on a conventional BFM schedule intensified with three chemotherapy blocks followed by a double reinduction phase. RESULTS: The event-free survival and overall survival probabilities at 10 years for the entire group were 72.5% (SE, 1.3) and 83.6% (SE, 0.9); 85.0% (SE, 3.4) and 95.5% (SE, 2.0) in SR, 75.1% (SE, 1.5) and 87.5% (SE, 0.9) in IR, and 51.0% (SE, 3.2) and 57.2% (SE, 3.3) in HR patients, respectively. Patients with a favorable DNA index had superior EFS in both IR (83.8% [2.7%] v 73.9% [1.7%]) and in HR (67.8% [9.4%] and 49.6% [3.5%]). Of the six patients with DNA index less than 0.8, only one remained in remission. CONCLUSION: Favorable DNA index was associated with a better prognosis in IR and HR patients defined by presenting clinical criteria and treatment with a BFM-oriented chemotherapy.
Authors: Barbara De Moerloose; Stefan Suciu; Yves Bertrand; Françoise Mazingue; Alain Robert; Anne Uyttebroeck; Karima Yakouben; Alice Ferster; Geneviève Margueritte; Patrick Lutz; Martine Munzer; Nicolas Sirvent; Lucilia Norton; Patrick Boutard; Dominique Plantaz; Frederic Millot; Pierre Philippet; Liliana Baila; Yves Benoit; Jacques Otten Journal: Blood Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: A G Dinmohamed; A Szabó; M van der Mark; O Visser; P Sonneveld; J J Cornelissen; M Jongen-Lavrencic; A W Rijneveld Journal: Leukemia Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Michael J Kelly; Thomas A Trikalinos; Issa J Dahabreh; Matthew Gianferante; Susan K Parsons Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Caroline Hastings; Paul S Gaynon; James B Nachman; Harland N Sather; Xiaomin Lu; Meenakshi Devidas; Nita L Seibel Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 6.998