Literature DB >> 18182656

3 + 3 not equal to (Rolling) 6.

Christine Hartford, Samuel L Volchenboum, Susan L Cohn.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18182656     DOI： 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN： 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  A simulation-based comparison of the traditional method, Rolling-6 design and a frequentist version of the continual reassessment method with special attention to trial duration in pediatric Phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Arzu Onar-Thomas; Zang Xiong
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  The superiority of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to the rolling six design in pediatric oncology Phase I trials.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Julia Lee; Rajen Mody; Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 3.  Cell death-based treatment of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Mike-Andrew Westhoff; Nicolas Marschall; Michael Grunert; Georg Karpel-Massler; Stefan Burdach; Klaus-Michael Debatin
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 8.469
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.