Literature DB >> 1818185

A technique for typing Cryptosporidium isolates.

G L Nichols1, J McLauchlin, D Samuel.   

Abstract

Antigens extracted from Cryptosporidium oocysts, which had been purified from faeces or chick egg culture, were electrophoresed in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. A Cryptosporidium genus-specific monoclonal antibody MAb-C1 bound to multiple bands using several detection techniques, and these corresponded to bands detected using immune rabbit antisera. Using a detection system with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled MAb-C1 and alkaline phosphatase-labelled anti-FITC, bands were detected between 50 and 300 kDa. Blots were examined directly and by using a laser scanner. The system was shown to be specific for Cryptosporidium spp., giving no staining with a variety of other pathogens, and with negative samples. The oocyst antigen which bound MAb-C1 was stable, and banding patterns were not significantly affected by pretreatment of oocysts with proteinase K, trypsin, formalin, or sodium hypochlorite, methods commonly used during preparation and storage of C. parvum oocysts. However, banding was reduced with potassium dichromate. Of 76 samples containing Cryptosporidium oocysts, 53 showed one or more MAb-C1 staining bands. Cryptosporidium baileyi and C. parvum could be clearly differentiated by their banding patterns, indicating that the system will distinguish between species. Some isolates, including a single isolate of C. muris, produced weak bands which made interpretation difficult. The technique showed differences between isolates of C. parvum, with two different banding types found in human isolates, and other banding types seen in calf and lamb isolates. This method provides a useful way of characterising isolates which may be new species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1818185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Protozool        ISSN: 0022-3921


  4 in total

1.  Failure to differentiate Cryptosporidium parvum from C. meleagridis based on PCR amplification of eight DNA sequences.

Authors:  D Champliaud; P Gobet; M Naciri; O Vagner; J Lopez; J C Buisson; I Varga; G Harly; R Mancassola; A Bonnin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cryptosporidium infecting wild cricetid rodents from the subfamilies Arvicolinae and Neotominae.

Authors:  Brianna L S Stenger; Michaela Horčičková; Mark E Clark; Martin Kváč; Šárka Čondlová; Eakalak Khan; Giovanni Widmer; Lihua Xiao; Catherine W Giddings; Christopher Pennil; Michal Stanko; Bohumil Sak; John M McEvoy
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 3.  New insights into human cryptosporidiosis.

Authors:  D P Clark
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health.

Authors:  Lihua Xiao; Ronald Fayer; Una Ryan; Steve J Upton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.