Literature DB >> 18181818

Future patients? Telehealthcare, roles and responsibilities.

Tracy L Finch1, Maggie Mort, Frances S Mair, Carl R May.   

Abstract

Increasing use of information and communication technologies is said to be transforming health care. Telehealthcare enables medical consultations to be conducted between patients and health professionals across different locations. Such technologies imply new relationships between patients and health professionals. This study aimed to understand how policy and practice in relation to telehealthcare suggests new conceptualisations of 'the patient'. In-depth semistructured interviews (n = 38) were conducted with key informants from across the UK, known to have involvement or interest in telehealthcare from a variety of perspectives: health professionals (n = 11), patient advocates (n = 7), telemedicine experts (n = 6), policy-makers (n = 4), administrators (n = 4), researchers (n = 3) and technologists (n = 3). Interviews were conducted either in person or over the telephone, and were audio-recorded. Data were analysed thematically with ongoing cross-validation of data interpretation between members of the research team. The results indicated divergent views about the role of the patient, although accounts of patients becoming 'educated self-managers', taking on a more active role in their healthcare, were predominant. Beliefs about the impact of telehealthcare on patients were focused on perceived 'priorities' such as access, location of services, confidentiality and choice; however, there remains little understanding of the trade-offs that patients are willing to make in the context of technologically mediated health care. The results also highlight ideas around how patients relate to technologies; the extent to which technologies might fragment care and medicine in new or unexpected ways, and participation and absence of patients in decision-making about policies and services. The results of this study have important implications for the ways in which relationships between health professionals and patients are managed in practice, and raise important questions for public participation in service development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181818     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Managing health(-care systems) using information health technologies.

Authors:  Thomas Mathar
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

3.  Citation analysis of the prognosis of Haux et al. for the year 2013.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Safer@home-Simulation and training: the study protocol of a qualitative action research design.

Authors:  Siri Wiig; Veslemøy Guise; Janet Anderson; Marianne Storm; Anne Marie Lunde Husebø; Ingelin Testad; Elsa Søyland; Kirsti L Moltu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.