Literature DB >> 18181680

Formatting pathology reports: applying four design principles to improve communication and patient safety.

Paul N Valenstein1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Eighty-two million surgical pathology and cytology reports were issued in the United States during 2007; a subset of these reports will be misunderstood by readers. Recent attention has focused on standardizing the content of pathology reports, particularly for common malignancies, to facilitate transmission of required information. Comparatively little attention has been focused on the format of reports--the arrangement of headlines, text blocks, and other report elements to optimize communication.
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance to report designers and authors about how to format reports to maximize the speed, fidelity, and ease of information transfer. DATA SOURCES: Review of relevant literature from commercial publishing and aviation and the fields of cognitive psychology and pathology, supplemented with an analysis of 10,000 pathology reports and the author's personal experience as a practicing pathologist.
CONCLUSIONS: Four evidence-based and time-tested principles can help pathologists format information to communicate more effectively: (1) use of diagnostic headlines to emphasize key points, (2) maintenance of layout continuity with other reports and over time, (3) optimization of information density for readers, and (4) reduction of extraneous information or "clutter." Practical advice is also provided to help pathologists minimize corruption of formatting as reports are transmitted electronically between medical information systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181680     DOI: 10.5858/2008-132-84-FPRAFD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  16 in total

Review 1.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Trends and Challenges in Pathology Practice: Choices and necessities.

Authors:  Hassan Mh Kamel
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 3.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Dermatology in an age of fully transparent electronic medical records.

Authors:  Jason P Lott; Michael W Piepkorn; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.

Authors:  Katherine Froggatt; Ashley Best; Frances Bunn; Girvan Burnside; Joanna Coast; Lesley Dunleavy; Claire Goodman; Ben Hardwick; Clare Jackson; Julie Kinley; Anne Davidson Lund; Jennifer Lynch; Paul Mitchell; Gareth Myring; Shakil Patel; Guillermo Perez Algorta; Nancy Preston; David Scott; Kate Silvera; Catherine Walshe
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Utilization and utility of clinical laboratory reports with graphical elements.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Nichole Larsen; Brian R Jackson
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-08-25

7.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Implementation and use of electronic synoptic cancer reporting: an explorative case study of six Norwegian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Bettina Casati; Hans Kristian Haugland; Gunn Marit J Barstad; Roger Bjugn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Edwin W Gould
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-12-30

10.  Evidence-based design and evaluation of a whole genome sequencing clinical report for the reference microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Anamaria Crisan; Geoffrey McKee; Tamara Munzner; Jennifer L Gardy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.