CONTEXT: The development of trastuzumab has led to new therapeutic strategies for patients with breast cancer. Trastuzumab has been shown to only be effective in those patients whose cancers are HER2 positive by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of HER2 testing in 2 provinces in Canada. DESIGN: Patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2002 who were HER2 positive in the local laboratories were included in this study. All cases were retested centrally, by IHC (using 4 methods) and FISH. In addition, 205 locally reported HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer cases were retested centrally. RESULTS: Concordance between the 505 local IHC-positive cases with central IHC testing varied between 79.3% and 89.6% depending on the IHC method and scoring method used. HER2 gene amplification by FISH was present in 86.1% of local IHC-positive cases. Concordance between the 205 local IHC-negative tumors with central testing ranged between 94.8% and 100% for IHC and was 98.5% for FISH. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that locally reported HER2-negative results were highly accurate, but less accuracy was demonstrated with local HER2-positive results. These results emphasize the need for participation in a quality assurance program.
CONTEXT: The development of trastuzumab has led to new therapeutic strategies for patients with breast cancer. Trastuzumab has been shown to only be effective in those patients whose cancers are HER2 positive by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of HER2 testing in 2 provinces in Canada. DESIGN:Patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 1999 and 2002 who were HER2 positive in the local laboratories were included in this study. All cases were retested centrally, by IHC (using 4 methods) and FISH. In addition, 205 locally reported HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer cases were retested centrally. RESULTS: Concordance between the 505 local IHC-positive cases with central IHC testing varied between 79.3% and 89.6% depending on the IHC method and scoring method used. HER2 gene amplification by FISH was present in 86.1% of local IHC-positive cases. Concordance between the 205 local IHC-negative tumors with central testing ranged between 94.8% and 100% for IHC and was 98.5% for FISH. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that locally reported HER2-negative results were highly accurate, but less accuracy was demonstrated with local HER2-positive results. These results emphasize the need for participation in a quality assurance program.
Authors: C Butts; S Kamel-Reid; G Batist; S Chia; C Blanke; M Moore; M B Sawyer; C Desjardins; A Dubois; J Pun; K Bonter; F D Ashbury Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; Kendra L Schwartz; Weiqiang Zhao; Paul H Abrahamse; Dafydd G Thomas; Julie M Jorns; Rachel Jewell; Maria E Sibug Saber; Reina Haque; Steven J Katz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Tim J A Dekker; Susan Ter Borg; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Sybren L Meijer; Jelle Wesseling; James E Boers; Ed Schuuring; Jos Bart; Joost van Gorp; Wilma E Mesker; Judith R Kroep; Vincent T H B M Smit; Marc J van de Vijver Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Sarfraz Ahmed; Sadia Nawaz; Mogana Das Murtey; Muhammad Ibrahim; Waqas Ahmad; Muhammad Asif Idrees; Nur Asyilla Che Jalil; Nor Hayati Othman Journal: J Oncol Date: 2022-03-27 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Ilia L Ferrusi; Craig C Earle; Maureen Trudeau; Natasha B Leighl; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Hoa Khong; Jeffrey S Hoch; Deborah A Marshall Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.229