Literature DB >> 18181669

Cytologic malignancy versus benignancy: how useful are the "newer" markers in body fluid cytology?

Virganeyce Lyons-Boudreaux1, Dina R Mody, Jim Zhai, Donna Coffey.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Differentiating reactive effusion, malignant mesothelioma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma in body cavity fluids can be challenging. Interpreting immunohistochemical markers in cell block preparations can be difficult because of nonspecific staining, focal staining, or poor staining quality. We selected a panel of conventional and newer markers to assess their utility in evaluating effusions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of 5 immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial proliferation, malignant mesothelioma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma in body cavity fluids.
DESIGN: A total of 72 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell block specimens from pleural and peritoneal effusions, including 5 mesotheliomas, 48 adenocarcinomas, and 19 benign effusions were stained with antibodies against calretinin, D2-40, XIAP, MOC-31, and WT1.
RESULTS: All benign effusions and mesotheliomas demonstrated diffuse membranous staining with D2-40. All mesotheliomas displayed calretinin positivity, whereas only 58% of benign effusions stained focally with calretinin. MOC-31 was positive in all cases of adenocarcinoma, whereas all benign effusions and mesotheliomas were negative. All cases of the metastatic adenocarcinoma were negative for calretinin and D2-40. However, background reactive mesothelial cells were positive for calretinin and D2-40. Overall, D2-40 highlighted more mesothelial cells than calretinin. WT1 was positive in 50% of benign effusions, 60% of mesotheliomas, and 27% of adenocarcinomas. XIAP stained most mesotheliomas (80%), some adenocarcinomas (51%), and rare benign effusions (11%).
CONCLUSIONS: MOC-31 and D2-40 were very sensitive and specific markers of epithelial and mesothelial cells, respectively. Compared with calretinin, D2-40 was a more sensitive marker of mesothelial cells. WT1 proved to be nonspecific. XIAP was not a sensitive marker for malignancy and had a limited value in cytology. We recommend using a panel to include MOC-31 and D2-40 to improve diagnostic accuracy in body cavity effusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181669     DOI: 10.5858/2008-132-23-CMVBHU

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of effusion cytology.

Authors:  Zahraa Mohammed Yahya; Hussam Hasson Ali; Haider Ghazi Hussein
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-11

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of MOC-31 for malignant effusions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diandian Li; Bo Wang; Qianjing Hu; Yongchun Shen; Dan Xu; Tao Wang; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-08

3.  Neoplastic pericardial disease: Old and current strategies for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Chiara Lestuzzi
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-26

4.  Evaluation of pleural fluid survivin and XIAP for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.

Authors:  Jian Li; Zhen-Nan Li; Qian-Lei Bao; Li-Ping Ge; Xiao-Qin Li; Ping Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-06-14

Review 5.  Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S van der Bij; E Schaake; H Koffijberg; J A Burgers; B A J M de Mol; K G M Moons
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of calretinin for malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diandian Li; Bo Wang; Hongyu Long; Fuqiang Wen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A diagnostically difficult case of a cellular pleural fluid: Morphology, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization study.

Authors:  Minhua Wang; Shabnam Samankan; Amarpreet Bhalla; N Paul Ohori; Nora K Frisch
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  A Rare Case of Biphasic Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma with Refractory Ascites.

Authors:  Tomo Komaki; Hidenori Urata; Ken Mori; Akinori Iwashita; Keisuke Ikeda; Seiji Haraoka
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.271

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of Ber-EP4 for metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Diandian Li; Xuemei Ou; Qun Yi; Yulin Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnostic value of D2-40 immunostaining for malignant mesothelioma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao He; Bo Wang; Chun Wan; Ting Yang; Yongchun Shen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.