BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in spinal cord injured patients. The authors investigated the epidemiology of bacteria associated with UTI to select an appropriate antibiotic for empirical treatment of UTI before obtaining a bacterial culture. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, as well as the causative bacteria and their susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients hospitalized to the Rehabilitation Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Samutprakarn, Thailand from January 2001 to December 2005. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective chart review of 76 spinal cord injured patients. RESULTS: Of all spinal cord injured patients, there were 50 males and 26 females, with the average age of 44.70 years. The average length of hospitalization was 104.5 days. 71.2% of the patients needed intermittent catheterization for bladder drainage, and only 2.7% had suprapubic cystostomy. None of patient had indwelling catheterization. Forty-six patients had 68 episodes of UTI (60.52%). Eighteen patients had recurrent UTI (14 patients had two episodes and four patients had three episodes). E. coli was the most common isolated pathogen (74.36%) followed by K. pneumoniae (12.82%), E. faecalis (5%) and P. mirabilis (5%). Most gram-negative pathogens were susceptible to amikacin and third generation cephalosporins. The susceptibility of these organisms to cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin were in the range of 34.6-60.0%, 44.0-50.0% and 25.9-50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Urinary tract infections were commonly observed among spinal cord injured patients in the presented institution. E. coli was the most common isolated pathogen. Surprisingly, most gram-negative pathogens were resistant to cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin. An antibiotic of choice for UTI in our patients should be aminoglycoside or third generation cephalosporins.
BACKGROUND:Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in spinal cord injured patients. The authors investigated the epidemiology of bacteria associated with UTI to select an appropriate antibiotic for empirical treatment of UTI before obtaining a bacterial culture. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, as well as the causative bacteria and their susceptibility pattern of urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients hospitalized to the Rehabilitation Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Samutprakarn, Thailand from January 2001 to December 2005. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective chart review of 76 spinal cord injured patients. RESULTS: Of all spinal cord injured patients, there were 50 males and 26 females, with the average age of 44.70 years. The average length of hospitalization was 104.5 days. 71.2% of the patients needed intermittent catheterization for bladder drainage, and only 2.7% had suprapubic cystostomy. None of patient had indwelling catheterization. Forty-six patients had 68 episodes of UTI (60.52%). Eighteen patients had recurrent UTI (14 patients had two episodes and four patients had three episodes). E. coli was the most common isolated pathogen (74.36%) followed by K. pneumoniae (12.82%), E. faecalis (5%) and P. mirabilis (5%). Most gram-negative pathogens were susceptible to amikacin and third generation cephalosporins. The susceptibility of these organisms to cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin were in the range of 34.6-60.0%, 44.0-50.0% and 25.9-50.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION:Urinary tract infections were commonly observed among spinal cord injured patients in the presented institution. E. coli was the most common isolated pathogen. Surprisingly, most gram-negative pathogens were resistant to cotrimoxazole, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and ciprofloxacin. An antibiotic of choice for UTI in our patients should be aminoglycoside or third generation cephalosporins.
Authors: Margaret A Fitzpatrick; Katie J Suda; Nasia Safdar; Stephen P Burns; Makoto M Jones; Linda Poggensee; Swetha Ramanathan; Charlesnika T Evans Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: L Y Garcia-Arguello; J C O'Horo; A Farrell; R Blakney; M R Sohail; C T Evans; N Safdar Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 2.772