Literature DB >> 18181026

Measurement of ambient hydroperoxides using an automated HPLC system and various factors which affect variations of their concentrations in Korea.

Sang B Hong1, Gyu S Kim, Chang H Kang, Jai H Lee.   

Abstract

An HPLC system was automated for the measurement of gaseous hydroperoxides in the ambient air. In this system, samples collected using a glass coil without a long sampling tube are injected automatically into HPLC. The analytical system is based on the post-column derivatization, which is a reaction of hydroperoxides with p-hydroxyphenyl acetic acid to produce a fluorescent dimer in the presence of horseradish peroxidase as an enzyme catalyst. The detection limits of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) were from 0.018 to 0.042 ppbv. The gaseous hydroperoxides were measured in Gwangju during March, May and October 2002, and in Seoul during June 2002. H(2)O(2) concentrations were remarkably low and almost at the detection limit during a period of the yellow sand (Asian dust). These results might be strongly ascribed to the effect of Asian dust particles for heterogeneous loss of peroxides and partly loss of samples due to the storage of sample and analysis. Methyl hydroperoxide (CH(3)OOH) was identified and quantified only in Seoul. The highest concentrations of H(2)O(2) were 0.24, 2.84, and 0.89 ppbv during March, May, October, respectively in Gwangju, and 5.19 ppbv in Seoul. The concentration of CH(3)OOH was as high as 1.1 ppbv and sometimes its concentration was higher than that of H(2)O(2) in the early morning or in the late night. The variability of CH(3)OOH was lower than that of H(2)O(2). H(2)O(2) showed a positive relationship with O(3) (r = 0.54, P < 0.01 level; two-tailed), solar radiation (r = 0.61, P < 0.01 level; two-tailed), temperature (r = 0.66, P < 0.01 level; two-tailed), and a negative relationship with NO( x ) (r = -0.20, P < 0.05 level; two-tailed), and relative humidity (r = -0.58, P < 0.01 level; two-tailed) in Seoul. Thus, photochemical activity is considered an important factor in gaseous H(2)O(2) and CH(3)OOH distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18181026     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-0094-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  3 in total

1.  Atmospheric H2O2 measurement: comparison of cold trap method with impinger bubbling method.

Authors:  H Sakugawa; I R Kaplan
Journal:  Atmos Environ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  An Improved Nonenzymic Method for the Determination of Gas-phase Peroxides.

Authors:  J H Lee; I N Tang; J B Weinstein-Lloyd; E B Halper
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  The determination of ambient formaldehyde using a dual coil system and an assessment of dominant factors that influence its abundance in Korea.

Authors:  Sang B Hong; Guy S Kim; Yong G Jung; Jai H Lee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.