Literature DB >> 18180491

Is spending more always wasteful? The appropriateness of care and outcomes among colorectal cancer patients.

Mary Beth Landrum1, Ellen R Meara, Amitabh Chandra, Edward Guadagnoli, Nancy L Keating.   

Abstract

Increased area-level medical spending is not correlated with improved patient outcomes or quality, thereby supporting the case for spending reductions in high-spending regions. However, all additional spending need not be wasteful. Examining the care of patients with colorectal cancer, we show that high-spending regions are more likely than other regions to use recommended care but are also more likely to use discretionary and nonrecommended care, the latter of which has adverse outcomes for patients. Our results show that instead of cutting spending, policies designed to target services to patients most likely to benefit could increase the value of medical spending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18180491     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  23 in total

1.  Medicare spending, mortality rates, and quality of care.

Authors:  Jack Hadley; James D Reschovsky
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Too Little? Too Much? Primary care physicians' views on US health care: a brief report.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-26

3.  County-level variation in readmission rates: implications for the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program's potential to succeed.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; Ling Li; Dhruv B Sharma; Jane C Weeks; Michael J Hassett; K Robin Yabroff; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Association Between Spending and Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Meng Li; Darius N Lakdawalla; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter S Hussey; Samuel Wertheimer; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Measuring low-value care in Medicare.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Bruce E Landon; Adam G Elshaug; Michael E Chernew; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Comparative effectiveness and health care spending--implications for reform.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; Jonathan A Skinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Geographic variation of chronic opioid use in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Jacob T Painter; Leslie J Crofford; Jeffery Talbert
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Disease-related costs of care and survival among Medicare-enrolled patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Amer M Zeidan; Rong Wang; Amy J Davidoff; Shuangge Ma; Yinjun Zhao; Steven D Gore; Cary P Gross; Xiaomei Ma
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.