BACKGROUND: In spite of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) being an effective and widely used method to screen the proteome, its data standardization has still not matured to the level of microarray genomics data or mass spectrometry approaches. The trend toward identifying encompassing data standards has been expanding from genomics to transcriptomics, and more recently to proteomics. The relative success of genomic and transcriptomic data standardization has enabled the development of central repositories such as GenBank and Gene Expression Omnibus. An equivalent 2-DE-centric data structure would similarly have to include a balance among raw data, basic feature detection results, sufficiency in the description of the experimental context and methods, and an overall structure that facilitates a diversity of usages, from central reposition to local data representation in LIMs systems. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Achieving such a balance can only be accomplished through several iterations involving bioinformaticians, bench molecular biologists, and the manufacturers of the equipment and commercial software from which the data is primarily generated. Such an encompassing data structure is described here, developed as the mature successor to the well established and broadly used earlier version. A public repository, AGML Central, is configured with a suite of tools for the conversion from a variety of popular formats, web-based visualization, and interoperation with other tools and repositories, and is particularly mass-spectrometry oriented with I/O for annotation and data analysis.
BACKGROUND: In spite of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) being an effective and widely used method to screen the proteome, its data standardization has still not matured to the level of microarray genomics data or mass spectrometry approaches. The trend toward identifying encompassing data standards has been expanding from genomics to transcriptomics, and more recently to proteomics. The relative success of genomic and transcriptomic data standardization has enabled the development of central repositories such as GenBank and Gene Expression Omnibus. An equivalent 2-DE-centric data structure would similarly have to include a balance among raw data, basic feature detection results, sufficiency in the description of the experimental context and methods, and an overall structure that facilitates a diversity of usages, from central reposition to local data representation in LIMs systems. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Achieving such a balance can only be accomplished through several iterations involving bioinformaticians, bench molecular biologists, and the manufacturers of the equipment and commercial software from which the data is primarily generated. Such an encompassing data structure is described here, developed as the mature successor to the well established and broadly used earlier version. A public repository, AGML Central, is configured with a suite of tools for the conversion from a variety of popular formats, web-based visualization, and interoperation with other tools and repositories, and is particularly mass-spectrometry oriented with I/O for annotation and data analysis.
Authors: Chris F Taylor; Norman W Paton; Kathryn S Lilley; Pierre-Alain Binz; Randall K Julian; Andrew R Jones; Weimin Zhu; Rolf Apweiler; Ruedi Aebersold; Eric W Deutsch; Michael J Dunn; Albert J R Heck; Alexander Leitner; Marcus Macht; Matthias Mann; Lennart Martens; Thomas A Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Peipei Ping; Sean L Seymour; Puneet Souda; Akira Tsugita; Joel Vandekerckhove; Thomas M Vondriska; Julian P Whitelegge; Marc R Wilkins; Ioannnis Xenarios; John R Yates; Henning Hermjakob Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Chris F Taylor; Norman W Paton; Kevin L Garwood; Paul D Kirby; David A Stead; Zhikang Yin; Eric W Deutsch; Laura Selway; Janet Walker; Isabel Riba-Garcia; Shabaz Mohammed; Michael J Deery; Julie A Howard; Tom Dunkley; Ruedi Aebersold; Douglas B Kell; Kathryn S Lilley; Peter Roepstorff; John R Yates; Andy Brass; Alistair J P Brown; Phil Cash; Simon J Gaskell; Simon J Hubbard; Stephen G Oliver Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Patrick G A Pedrioli; Jimmy K Eng; Robert Hubley; Mathijs Vogelzang; Eric W Deutsch; Brian Raught; Brian Pratt; Erik Nilsson; Ruth H Angeletti; Rolf Apweiler; Kei Cheung; Catherine E Costello; Henning Hermjakob; Sequin Huang; Randall K Julian; Eugene Kapp; Mark E McComb; Stephen G Oliver; Gilbert Omenn; Norman W Paton; Richard Simpson; Richard Smith; Chris F Taylor; Weimin Zhu; Ruedi Aebersold Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Romesh Stanislaus; Liu Hong Jiang; Martha Swartz; John Arthur; Jonas S Almeida Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2004-01-29 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Frank Gibson; Christine Hoogland; Salvador Martinez-Bartolomé; J Alberto Medina-Aunon; Juan Pablo Albar; Gyorgy Babnigg; Anil Wipat; Henning Hermjakob; Jonas S Almeida; Romesh Stanislaus; Norman W Paton; Andrew R Jones Journal: Proteomics Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.984