Literature DB >> 18179668

Health-related quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments.

Maite Solans1, Sabrina Pane, Maria-Dolors Estrada, Vicky Serra-Sutton, Silvina Berra, Michael Herdman, Jordi Alonso, Luis Rajmil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify currently available generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments for children and adolescents up to 19 years old, to describe their content, and to review their psychometric properties. STUDY
DESIGN: Previous reviews on the subject and a new literature review from 2001 to December 2006 (MEDLINE, the ISI Science Citation Index, HealthSTAR and PsycLit) were used to identify measures of HRQOL for children and adolescents. The characteristics (country of origin, age range, type of respondent, number of dimensions and items, name of the dimensions and condition) and psychometric properties (reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change) of the instruments were assessed following international guidelines published by the Scientific Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust.
RESULTS: In total, 30 generic and 64 disease-specific instruments were identified, 51 of which were published between 2001 and 2005. Many generic measures cover a core set of basic concepts related to physical, mental and social health, although the number and name of dimensions varies substantially. The lower age limit for self-reported instruments was 5-6 years old. Generic measures developed recently focused on both child self-report and parent-proxy report, although 26% of the disease-specific questionnaires were exclusively addressed to proxy-respondents. Most questionnaires had tested internal consistency (67%) and to a lesser extent test-retest stability (44.7%). Most questionnaires reported construct validity, but few instruments analyzed criterion validity (n = 5), structural validity (n = 15) or sensitivity to change (n = 14).
CONCLUSIONS: The development of HRQOL instruments for children and adolescents has continued apace in recent years, particularly with regard to disease-specific questionnaires. Many of the instruments meet accepted standards for psychometric properties, although instrument developers should include children from the beginning of the development process and need to pay particular attention to testing sensitivity to change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18179668     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00293.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  151 in total

1.  Quality of life following surgery for congenital glaucoma: findings of the LVPEI congenital glaucoma registry.

Authors:  Vijaya K Gothwal; Bharani Seelam; Anil K Mandal
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents following traumatic injury: a review.

Authors:  Susanne P Martin-Herz; Douglas F Zatzick; Robert J McMahon
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09

3.  Letter to the Editor: Concerning Paltzer, Jason, Emily Barker, and Whitney P. Witt: Measuring the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of young children in resource-limited settings: a review of existing measures, Quality of Life Research: Vol. 22, No. 6, August, 2013, pp 1177-1187.

Authors:  Ronald D Barr; David Feeny; William Furlong; John Horsman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The impact of coping patterns and chronic health conditions on health-related quality of life among children and adolescents.

Authors:  Sabrina Oppenheimer; Orit Krispin; Sigal Levy; Maayan Ozeri; Alan Apter
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Quality of life: what does it mean for general practice?

Authors:  J E Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The effect of functioning on Quality of Life Inventory-Disability measured quality of life is not mediated or moderated by parental psychological distress.

Authors:  A J O Whitehouse; P Jacoby; D Reddihough; H Leonard; K Williams; Jenny Downs
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Vero Schiariti; Cristina Bostan; Alarcos Cieza; Anne Klassen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Health-related quality of life in young adults in education, employment, or training: development of the Japanese version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales Young Adult Version.

Authors:  Mei Kaneko; Iori Sato; Takafumi Soejima; Kiyoko Kamibeppu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the KIDSCREEN-52 health-related quality of life questionnaire for children/adolescents and parents/proxies.

Authors:  Satoko Nezu; Hidemi Iwasaka; Keigo Saeki; Rika Ishizuka; Hideyo Goma; Nozomi Okamoto; Hiroko Makino; Masami Tanimura; Kazumi Yoshizaki; Kenji Obayashi; Norio Kurumatani
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 10.  Quality of life questionnaires for children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors: a review of the development of available measures.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Sonya J Strohm; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.