Literature DB >> 18179439

Independent evolutionary origins of landlocked alewife populations and rapid parallel evolution of phenotypic traits.

Eric P Palkovacs1, Kirstin B Dion, David M Post, Adalgisa Caccone.   

Abstract

Alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus, populations occur in two discrete life-history variants, an anadromous form and a landlocked (freshwater resident) form. Landlocked populations display a consistent pattern of life-history divergence from anadromous populations, including earlier age at maturity, smaller adult body size, and reduced fecundity. In Connecticut (USA), dams constructed on coastal streams separate anadromous spawning runs from lake-resident landlocked populations. Here, we used sequence data from the mtDNA control region and allele frequency data from five microsatellite loci to ask whether coastal Connecticut landlocked alewife populations are independently evolved from anadromous populations or whether they share a common freshwater ancestor. We then used microsatellite data to estimate the timing of the divergence between anadromous and landlocked populations. Finally, we examined anadromous and landlocked populations for divergence in foraging morphology and used divergence time estimates to calculate the rate of evolution for foraging traits. Our results indicate that landlocked populations have evolved multiple times independently. Tests of population divergence and estimates of gene flow show that landlocked populations are genetically isolated, whereas anadromous populations exchange genes. These results support a 'phylogenetic raceme' model of landlocked alewife divergence, with anadromous populations forming an ancestral core from which landlocked populations independently diverged. Divergence time estimates suggest that landlocked populations diverged from a common anadromous ancestor no longer than 5000 years ago and perhaps as recently as 300 years ago, depending on the microsatellite mutation rate assumed. Examination of foraging traits reveals landlocked populations to have significantly narrower gapes and smaller gill raker spacings than anadromous populations, suggesting that they are adapted to foraging on smaller prey items. Estimates of evolutionary rates (in haldanes) indicate rapid evolution of foraging traits, possibly in response to changes in available resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18179439     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  26 in total

1.  Interpopulation variation in a fish predator drives evolutionary divergence in prey in lakes.

Authors:  Matthew R Walsh; David M Post
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play.

Authors:  David M Post; Eric P Palkovacs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Relaxed selection causes microevolution of seawater osmoregulation and gene expression in landlocked Alewives.

Authors:  Jonathan P Velotta; Stephen D McCormick; Rachel J O'Neill; Eric T Schultz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity within- and across-generations: a challenge for theory?

Authors:  Matthew R Walsh; Frank Cooley; Kelsey Biles; Stephan B Munch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A cascade of evolutionary change alters consumer-resource dynamics and ecosystem function.

Authors:  Matthew R Walsh; John P DeLong; Torrance C Hanley; David M Post
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The evolutionary origins of diadromy inferred from a time-calibrated phylogeny for Clupeiformes (herring and allies).

Authors:  Devin D Bloom; Nathan R Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Migratory lineages rapidly evolve larger body sizes than non-migratory relatives in ray-finned fishes.

Authors:  Michael D Burns; Devin D Bloom
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Intraspecific phenotypic variation among alewife populations drives parallel phenotypic shifts in bluegill.

Authors:  Magnus Huss; Jennifer G Howeth; Julia I Osterman; David M Post
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Inference of population history by coupling exploratory and model-driven phylogeographic analyses.

Authors:  Ryan C Garrick; Adalgisa Caccone; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Emergence of a novel prey life history promotes contemporary sympatric diversification in a top predator.

Authors:  Jakob Brodersen; Jennifer G Howeth; David M Post
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.