Literature DB >> 18178714

Effects of vasoconstriction and vasodilatation on LV and segmental circulatory energetics.

Jiun-Jr Wang1, Nigel G Shrive, Kim H Parker, John V Tyberg.   

Abstract

Although the hydraulic work generated by the left ventricle (LV) is not disputed, how the work was dissipated through the systemic circulation is still subject to interpretation. Recently, we proposed that the systemic circulation should be considered as waves and a reservoir system (Wk). By combining the arterial and venous reservoirs, the systemic vascular resistance can be viewed as a series of resistors, which in sequence are the large-artery resistance, arterial reservoir resistance, the microcirculatory resistance, venous reservoir resistance, and large-vein resistance, and propelling blood through these resistance elements represents resistive losses. We then studied the changes in the fraction of the work consumed by each element when infusing methoxamine (MTX), a vasoconstrictor, and sodium nitroprusside (NP), a vasodilator. Results show that, under control condition, approximately 50% of the LV stroke work was dissipated through arterial reservoir resistance (NP, approximately 36%; MTX, approximately 27%), another approximately 25% was dissipated by the microcirculation (NP, approximately 20%; MTX, approximately 66%), and approximately 20% of work by the large-artery resistances (NP, approximately 37%; MTX, approximately 6%). The energy dissipated by the venous resistances was small and had limited variation with NP and MTX, where the large-vein and venous reservoir resistances shared approximately 1 and approximately 3% of LV stroke work, respectively. Approximately 60% of LV stroke work is stored as the potential energy during systole under control, and the ratio decreases to approximately 45% with NP and approximately 80% with MTX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178714     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00983.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  3 in total

Review 1.  Wave intensity analysis and the development of the reservoir-wave approach.

Authors:  John V Tyberg; Justin E Davies; Zhibin Wang; William A Whitelaw; Jacqueline A Flewitt; Nigel G Shrive; Darryl P Francis; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jiun-Jr Wang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Genesis of the characteristic pulmonary venous pressure waveform as described by the reservoir-wave model.

Authors:  J Christopher Bouwmeester; Israel Belenkie; Nigel G Shrive; John V Tyberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Wave reflections in the pulmonary arteries analysed with the reservoir-wave model.

Authors:  J Christopher Bouwmeester; Israel Belenkie; Nigel G Shrive; John V Tyberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 5.182

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.