Literature DB >> 18178516

Detecting deception: the scope and limits.

Kamila E Sip1, Andreas Roepstorff, William McGregor, Chris D Frith.   

Abstract

With the increasing interest in the neuroimaging of deception and its commercial application, there is a need to pay more attention to methodology. The weakness of studying deception in an experimental setting has been discussed intensively for over half a century. However, even though much effort has been put into their development, paradigms are still inadequate. The problems that bedevilled the old technology have not been eliminated by the new. Advances will only be possible if experiments are designed that take account of the intentions of the subject and the context in which these occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178516     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  55 in total

1.  Honesty mediates the relationship between serotonin and reaction to unfairness.

Authors:  Hidehiko Takahashi; Harumasa Takano; Colin F Camerer; Takashi Ideno; Shigetaka Okubo; Hiroshi Matsui; Yuki Tamari; Kazuhisa Takemura; Ryosuke Arakawa; Fumitoshi Kodaka; Makiko Yamada; Yoko Eguchi; Toshiya Murai; Yoshiro Okubo; Motoichiro Kato; Hiroshi Ito; Tetsuya Suhara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Joseph M Paxton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics.

Authors:  Stephan Schleim; Tade M Spranger; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Using fMRI to decode true thoughts independent of intention to conceal.

Authors:  Zhi Yang; Zirui Huang; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Rui Dai; Georg Northoff; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The role of anterior prefrontal cortex (area 10) in face-to-face deception measured with fNIRS.

Authors:  Paola Pinti; Andrea Devoto; Isobel Greenhalgh; Ilias Tachtsidis; Paul W Burgess; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Cognitive neuroscience of honesty and deception: A signaling framework.

Authors:  Adrianna Jenkins; Lusha Zhu; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-10

8.  The presentation order of cue and target matters in deception study.

Authors:  Guangheng Dong; Yanbo Hu; Qilin Lu; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoqing Gao; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Do parkinsonian patients have trouble telling lies? The neurobiological basis of deceptive behaviour.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Toshikatsu Fujii; Kazumi Hirayama; Atsushi Takeda; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Toshiyuki Ishioka; Yoshiyuki Nishio; Kyoko Suzuki; Yasuto Itoyama; Shoki Takahashi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.