Literature DB >> 18178397

Potential impact of noncontrast computed tomography as gatekeeper for myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography in patients admitted to the chest pain unit.

Fabio P Esteves1, Rupan Sanyal, Cesar A Santana, Leslee Shaw, Paolo Raggi.   

Abstract

We investigated the ability of coronary artery calcium (CAC) to predict a normal adenosine stress rubidium-82 (Rb-82) myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography (PET) in patients admitted to the chest pain unit. Eighty-four consecutive patients (33 men; mean age 62 +/- 14.8 years) with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease were included. A single noncontrast computed tomogram under shallow breathing was obtained for attenuation correction and to assess the presence of CAC. This was followed by a rest and adenosine stress dynamic Rb-82 emission PET. Computed tomography and PET images were interpreted independently. There was a high prevalence of risk factors (80% hypertension, 30% diabetes, 38% hypercholesterolemia, 13% smoking); prior coronary revascularization and myocardial infarction were present in 21% and 15% of the patients, respectively. The absence of CAC was associated with a normal adenosine stress Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET in 34 of 34 patients, yielding a negative predictive value of 100%. The presence of CAC (50 of 84) was associated with a higher incidence of myocardial perfusion defects (13 of 50), yielding a positive predictive value of 26%. Sensitivity was 100% (13 of 13) and specificity was 48% (34 of 71). In conclusion, the absence of CAC is predictive of a normal adenosine stress Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET in patients admitted to the chest pain unit. If these results are confirmed, myocardial perfusion imaging probably can be safely avoided in chest pain patients with negative CAC with low to intermediate pretest likelihood of disease. This approach may decrease overall radiation exposure and hospital time and prove to be cost effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18178397     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence of coronary artery calcium scores and silent myocardial ischaemia was similar in Indian Asians and European whites in a cross-sectional study of asymptomatic subjects from a U.K. population (LOLIPOP-IPC).

Authors:  Piyush Jain; Jaspal S Kooner; Usha Raval; Avijit Lahiri
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Calcification in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Management in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Thomas Mayrhofer; Fabian Bamberg; Travis R Hallett; Sumbal Janjua; Daniel Addison; John T Nagurney; James E Udelson; Michael T Lu; Quynh A Truong; Pamela K Woodard; Judd E Hollander; Chadwick Miller; Anna Marie Chang; Harjit Singh; Harold Litt; Udo Hoffmann; Maros Ferencik
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Zero Calcium Score as a Filter for Further Testing in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit with Chest Pain.

Authors:  Luis Cláudio Lemos Correia; Fábio P Esteves; Manuela Carvalhal; Thiago Menezes Barbosa de Souza; Nicole de Sá; Vitor Calixto de Almeida Correia; Felipe Kalil Beirão Alexandre; Fernanda Lopes; Felipe Ferreira; Márcia Noya-Rabelo
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Coronary artery calcium scores: current thinking and clinical applications.

Authors:  Anil George; Assad Movahed
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2008-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.