Literature DB >> 18178345

In vitro evaluation of sperm quality.

E Mocé1, J K Graham.   

Abstract

This paper highlights selected laboratory analyses that are currently used to evaluate sperm, and describes why results from these assays do not consistently correlate with sperm fertility. Reasons for the disconnect between the two are due in part to the definition and reliability of the fertility data collected, to the complexity of the spermatozoon itself, to imprecision of some measurements, and to uncontrollable factors not associated to either the laboratory analysis or the sperm sample. Each sperm must possess a number of different attributes to fertilize an oocyte, and individual laboratory assays measure only one or a few of these attributes. Current and past data, correlating laboratory assay data with sperm fertility are presented in an effort to determine which types of assays are important to conduct and when to conduct them. Even though laboratory assay results do not allow accurate evaluation of the fertilizing potential of a semen sample, these assays are important to enable culling of poor quality samples.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18178345     DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci        ISSN: 0378-4320            Impact factor:   2.145


  8 in total

1.  Quality of fresh and chilled-stored raccoon dog semen and its impact on artificial insemination efficiency.

Authors:  Łukasz Jarosz; Zbigniew Grądzki; Marcin Kalinowski; Ewa Laskowska
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Comparison of sperm subpopulation structures in first and second ejaculated semen from Japanese black bulls by a cluster analysis of sperm motility evaluated by a CASA system.

Authors:  Chihiro Kanno; Kentaro Q Sakamoto; Yojiro Yanagawa; Yoshiyuki Takahashi; Seiji Katagiri; Masashi Nagano
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Tetrazolium Salt WST-8 as a Novel and Reliable Chromogenic Indicator for the Assessment of Boar Semen Quality.

Authors:  Yu-Hsin Chen; Chean-Ping Wu; Hsiu-Lien Lin; Ren-Bao Liaw; Yung-Yu Lai; Ming-Che Wu; Lih-Ren Chen; Pei-Shiue Jason Tsai
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effects of cysteine and ascorbic acid in freezing extender on sperm characteristics and level of enzymes in post-thawed stallion semen.

Authors:  Mohaammed S Alamaary; Abd W Haron; Mark W H Hiew; Mohamed Ali
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  The Effect of Different Extenders on the Quality Characteristics of European Red Deer Epididymal Sperm Stored at 5 °C.

Authors:  Anna Dziekońska; Nicoletta M Neuman; Klaudia K Burdal; Agnieszka Wiszniewska-Łaszczych; Marek Bogdaszewski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Semen molecular and cellular features: these parameters can reliably predict subsequent ART outcome in a goat model.

Authors:  Fiammetta Berlinguer; Manuela Madeddu; Valeria Pasciu; Sara Succu; Antonio Spezzigu; Valentina Satta; Paolo Mereu; Giovanni G Leoni; Salvatore Naitana
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Conventional and fluorescent based semen quality assessment in Karan Fries bulls.

Authors:  A Panmei; A K Gupta; P R Shivahre; M Bhakat; A Upadhyay
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-10-28

8.  Metabolomic markers of fertility in bull seminal plasma.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Cazaux Velho; Erika Menezes; Thu Dinh; Abdullah Kaya; Einko Topper; Arlindo Alencar Moura; Erdogan Memili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.