Literature DB >> 18177786

Polytomous regression did not outperform dichotomous logistic regression in diagnosing serious bacterial infections in febrile children.

Jolt Roukema1, Rhiannon B van Loenhout, Ewout W Steyerberg, Karel G M Moons, Sacha E Bleeker, Henriëtte A Moll.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare polytomous and dichotomous logistic regression analyses in diagnosing serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in children with fever without apparent source (FWS). STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We analyzed data of 595 children aged 1-36 months, who attended the emergency department with fever without source. Outcome categories were SBI, subdivided in pneumonia and other-SBI (OSBI), and non-SBI. Potential predictors were selected based on previous studies and literature. Four models were developed: a polytomous model, estimating probabilities for three diagnostic categories simultaneously; two sequential dichotomous models, which differed in variable selection, discriminating SBI and non-SBI in step 1, and pneumonia and OSBI in step 2; and model 4, where each outcome category was opposed to the other two. The models were compared with respect to the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each of the three outcome categories and to the variable selection.
RESULTS: Small differences were found in the variables that were selected in the polytomous and dichotomous models. The AUCs of the three outcome categories were similar for each modeling strategy.
CONCLUSION: A polytomous logistic regression analysis did not outperform sequential and single application of dichotomous logistic regression analyses in diagnosing SBIs in children with FWS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177786     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

1.  Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Lil Valentin; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Antonia C Testa; Tom Bourne; Sabine Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Confounder summary scores when comparing the effects of multiple drug exposures.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Joshua J Gagne; Daniel H Solomon; Jeffrey N Katz; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Risk of ischemic stroke associated with the use of antipsychotic drugs in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Ju-Young Shin; Nam-Kyong Choi; Joongyub Lee; Jong-Mi Seong; Mi-Ju Park; Shin Haeng Lee; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Using ordinal outcomes to construct and select biomarker combinations for single-level prediction.

Authors:  Allison Meisner; Chirag R Parikh; Kathleen F Kerr
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.

Authors:  Valentijn M T de Jong; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Ben van Calster; Dirk Timmerman; Karel G M Moons; Ewout W Steyerberg; Maarten van Smeden
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.