Literature DB >> 18177462

The sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding.

Tyler J VanderWeele1.   

Abstract

Unmeasured confounding variables are a common problem in drawing causal inferences in observational studies. A theorem is given which in certain circumstances allows the researcher to draw conclusions about the sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding. Specifically, it is possible to determine the sign of the bias when monotonicity relationships hold between the unmeasured confounding variable and the treatment, and between the unmeasured confounding variable and the outcome. Some discussion is given to the conditions under which the theorem applies and the strengths and limitations of using the theorem to assess the sign of the bias of unmeasured confounding.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18177462     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00957.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

1.  Time-modified confounding.

Authors:  Robert W Platt; Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.

Authors:  Felix Elwert; Christopher Winship
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2014-06-02

3.  Analytic results on the bias due to nondifferential misclassification of a binary mediator.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Changyu Shen; Xiaochun Li; Lingling Li; Martin C Were
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables.

Authors:  Linbo Wang; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Disparate rates of new-onset depression during the menopausal transition in 2 community-based populations: real, or really wrong?

Authors:  Bernard L Harlow; Richard F MacLehose; Derek J Smolenski; Claudio N Soares; Michael W Otto; Hadine Joffe; Lee S Cohen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Causal directed acyclic graphs and the direction of unmeasured confounding bias.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Controlled direct and mediated effects: definition, identification and bounds.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.