Literature DB >> 18177364

Focal motor seizures induced by alerting stimuli in critically ill patients.

Lawrence J Hirsch1, Trudy Pang, Jan Claassen, Craig Chang, Karine Abou Khaled, John Wittman, Ronald G Emerson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously demonstrated that it is common for alerting stimuli to induce electrographic seizures and other periodic or rhythmic patterns in the critically ill; however, only 1 of the first 33 patients we reported with this phenomenon had a detectable clinical correlate.
METHODS: Review of charts and video EEG findings in critically ill patients in a neurological ICU at a tertiary care medical center in Manhattan.
RESULTS: We identified nine patients who had focal motor seizures repeatedly induced by alerting stimuli. All patients were comatose, and 8/9 had nonconvulsive status epilepticus at some point during their acute illness. Imaging abnormalities involved bilateral thalami in three patients, upper brainstem in one, and the perirolandic region in five. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that in encephalopathic patients, alerting stimuli activate the arousal circuitry, and, when combined with hyperexcitable cortex, result in epileptiform activity or seizures. This activity can be focal or generalized, and is usually nonconvulsive, as is true of seizures in general in the critically ill. However, when the cortex is hyperexcitable in a specific region only, focal EEG findings arise. If the electrographic seizure activity is adequately synchronized and involves motor pathways, this can present as focal motor seizures, as seen in these nine patients. Alerting can induce seizures in encephalopathic/comatose patients. The observation of clear focal clinical seizures removes the last remaining doubt that these stimulus-induced patterns are indeed seizures by any definition, not simply abnormal arousal patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18177364     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01481.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Ictal-Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?

Authors:  Clio Rubinos; Alexandra S Reynolds; Jan Claassen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Ictal Interictal Continuum Patterns.

Authors:  Gamaleldin M Osman; Davi F Araújo; Carolina B Maciel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Stimulus-induced, sleep-bound, focal seizures: a case report.

Authors:  Francesca Siclari; Lino Nobili; Giorgio Lo Russo; Alessio Moscato; Alfred Buck; Claudio L Bassetti; Ramin Khatami
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Frequency of non-convulsive seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients in need of controlled ventilation and sedation.

Authors:  Cecilia Lindgren; Erik Nordh; Silvana Naredi; Magnus Olivecrona
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Abnormal movements in critical care patients with brain injury: a diagnostic approach.

Authors:  Yousef Hannawi; Michael S Abers; Romergryko G Geocadin; Marek A Mirski
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  A 73-Year-Old Woman with Respiratory Failure and Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges (SIRPIDs) in the Absence of a Detectable Brain Insult Diagnosed and Monitored by Continuous Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Treated with Valproate, Carbamazepine, and Clonazepam.

Authors:  Adel M Bataineh; Ahmed Yassin; Khalid El-Salem; Salma Y Bashayreh; Kefah A Alhayk; Majdi Al Qawasmeh; Raid M Kofahi; Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-30

Review 7.  Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury.

Authors:  Jan Claassen; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.