AIM: To compare the prognosis of patients who underwent hepatectomy and ablation using the modified Japan Integrated Staging score (mJIS). METHODS: We examined the clinicopathologic records and patient outcomes in 278 HCC patients including 226 undergoing hepatectomy and 52 undergoing ablation therapy. RESULTS: Cirrhosis was more frequent in the ablation group. Tumor size, number and presence of vascular invasion were significantly higher in the operation group compared to the ablation group. The local recurrence rate adjacent to treated lesions was significantly higher in the ablation group compared to the operation group (P < 0.05). The 3- and 5-year survival rates in the ablation and the operation group were 66% and 78%, and 50% and 63%, respectively, but not significantly different. Over 50% survival rates were observed in patients with a mJIS score of 0-2 in both groups. However, survival rates with a score of 3-5 in both groups were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: According to the mJIS system, both local treatments could be selected for patients with a score of 0-2. However, for patients with a score more than 3, liver transplantation might be a better option in patients with HCC.
AIM: To compare the prognosis of patients who underwent hepatectomy and ablation using the modified Japan Integrated Staging score (mJIS). METHODS: We examined the clinicopathologic records and patient outcomes in 278 HCC patients including 226 undergoing hepatectomy and 52 undergoing ablation therapy. RESULTS:Cirrhosis was more frequent in the ablation group. Tumor size, number and presence of vascular invasion were significantly higher in the operation group compared to the ablation group. The local recurrence rate adjacent to treated lesions was significantly higher in the ablation group compared to the operation group (P < 0.05). The 3- and 5-year survival rates in the ablation and the operation group were 66% and 78%, and 50% and 63%, respectively, but not significantly different. Over 50% survival rates were observed in patients with a mJIS score of 0-2 in both groups. However, survival rates with a score of 3-5 in both groups were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: According to the mJIS system, both local treatments could be selected for patients with a score of 0-2. However, for patients with a score more than 3, liver transplantation might be a better option in patients with HCC.
Authors: S Arii; Y Yamaoka; S Futagawa; K Inoue; K Kobayashi; M Kojiro; M Makuuchi; Y Nakamura; K Okita; R Yamada Journal: Hepatology Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Francis Y Yao; Linda Ferrell; Nathan M Bass; Peter Bacchetti; Nancy L Ascher; John P Roberts Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Thomas W T Leung; Amanda M Y Tang; Benny Zee; W Y Lau; Paul B S Lai; K L Leung; Joseph T F Lau; Simon C H Yu; Philip J Johnson Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A Nanashima; S Morino; H Yamaguchi; K Tanaka; S Shibasaki; T Tsuji; S Hidaka; T Sawai; T Yasutake; T Nakagoe Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.424