Literature DB >> 18176348

Effect of radiation techniques in treatment of oropharynx cancer.

Kyle E Rusthoven1, David Raben, Ari Ballonoff, Madeleine Kane, John I Song, Changhu Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the toxicity and outcomes of three radiotherapy techniques-three-dimensional conformal (3D-RT), accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost (AFxCB), and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-in the combined modality treatment of stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2007, a total of 87 patients were treated; 23 were treated with 3D-RT, 32 with AFxCB, and 32 with IMRT. Systemic therapy consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy in 81 and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR)-targeted therapy in 6 cases. Median radiotherapy doses were 70Gy with 3D-RT, 72Gy with AFxCB, and 69.3Gy with IMRT. Locoregional control, survival outcomes, and feeding tube (PEG) dependence were compared using log-rank method. The incidence of acute mucositis and skin reaction, and grade > or = 2 xerostomia at 6, 12, and 18 months after radiotherapy was compared using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (range 3 to 103 months) for living patients. Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC) were 77.3%, 69.5%, and 86.4%, respectively. There was a trend toward improvement in LRC in patients treated with IMRT. Acute grade > or = 3 skin and mucosal toxicity were significantly lower with IMRT compared to AFxCB (P < .001). Grade > or = 2 xerostomia was significantly reduced with IMRT compared to AFxCB and 3D-RT (P < .001). There was no difference in the actuarial rate of PEG dependence (P = .96).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to AFxCB and 3D-RT, IMRT confers an improvement in toxicity and appears to have similar efficacy in patients with SCC of the oropharynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18176348     DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31815fdf0e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  9 in total

1.  Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of helical tomotherapy, forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-phase conformal plans for radical radiotherapy treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  S Chatterjee; N Willis; S M Locks; J H Mott; C G Kelly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Validation of an updated evidence-based protocol for proactive gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  T E Brown; V Getliffe; M D Banks; B G M Hughes; C Y Lin; L M Kenny; J D Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S W Loo; W M C Martin; P Smith; S Cherian; T W Roques
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Transoral robotic surgery in management of oropharyngeal cancers: a preliminary experience at a tertiary cancer centre in India.

Authors:  Surender Dabas; Abhinav Dewan; Reetesh Ranjan; Ajay Kumar Dewan; Anoop Puri; Swati H Shah; Rupal Sinha
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Current trends in initial management of oropharyngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery.

Authors:  Missak Haigentz; Carl E Silver; June Corry; Eric M Genden; Robert P Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  New radiotherapy techniques do not reduce the need for nutrition intervention in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  T Brown; M Banks; B G M Hughes; C Lin; L M Kenny; J D Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Samuel A Dowthwaite; Jason H Franklin; David A Palma; Kevin Fung; John Yoo; Anthony C Nichols
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.