BACKGROUND: To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of treatment success immediately after CT-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS: 26 patients with 38 Colorectal liver metastasis (CRM) were treated by CT-guided RF ablation. Pre-contrast and portal phase CT features before and immediately after ablation were retrospectively evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively: Influence of attenuation characteristics, safety margin, congruency between tumor and coagulation, and morphological criteria (shape, margin distinction, margin configuration, and margin continuity) were investigated. Findings were statistically analyzed with regard to local tumor progression. RESULTS: Mean observation period for follow-up scans was 6.4 months (range: 3-40 months). Attenuation characteristics, safety margin, and congruency had no significant effect on the probability of local tumor progression. Coagulations whose margin was categorized as "discontinuous" were significantly more often associated with local recurrence (p = 0.038). No significant influence on local recurrence could be detected regarding coagulation shape, margin distinction, and configuration. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography imaging immediately after RF ablation allows for morphological characterization of the coagulation and provides a valid baseline status for follow-up imaging. However, in CRM, morphological image criteria and attenuation characteristics have limited predictive value for immediate detection of persistent tumor.
BACKGROUND: To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of treatment success immediately after CT-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS: 26 patients with 38 Colorectal liver metastasis (CRM) were treated by CT-guided RF ablation. Pre-contrast and portal phase CT features before and immediately after ablation were retrospectively evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively: Influence of attenuation characteristics, safety margin, congruency between tumor and coagulation, and morphological criteria (shape, margin distinction, margin configuration, and margin continuity) were investigated. Findings were statistically analyzed with regard to local tumor progression. RESULTS: Mean observation period for follow-up scans was 6.4 months (range: 3-40 months). Attenuation characteristics, safety margin, and congruency had no significant effect on the probability of local tumor progression. Coagulations whose margin was categorized as "discontinuous" were significantly more often associated with local recurrence (p = 0.038). No significant influence on local recurrence could be detected regarding coagulation shape, margin distinction, and configuration. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography imaging immediately after RF ablation allows for morphological characterization of the coagulation and provides a valid baseline status for follow-up imaging. However, in CRM, morphological image criteria and attenuation characteristics have limited predictive value for immediate detection of persistent tumor.
Authors: Xiaodong Wang; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph P Erinjeri; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Kinh G Do; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Raymond H Thornton; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Mark G Van Vledder; Emad M Boctor; Lia R Assumpcao; Hassan Rivaz; Pezhman Foroughi; Gregory D Hager; Ulrike M Hamper; Timothy M Pawlik; Michael A Choti Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: T F Greten; N P Malek; S Schmidt; J Arends; P Bartenstein; W Bechstein; T Bernatik; M Bitzer; A Chavan; M Dollinger; D Domagk; O Drognitz; M Düx; S Farkas; G Folprecht; P Galle; M Geißler; G Gerken; D Habermehl; T Helmberger; K Herfarth; R T Hoffmann; M Holtmann; P Huppert; T Jakobs; M Keller; J Klempnauer; F Kolligs; J Körber; H Lang; F Lehner; F Lordick; A Lubienski; M P Manns; A Mahnken; M Möhler; C Mönch; P Neuhaus; C Niederau; M Ocker; G Otto; P Pereira; G Pott; J Riemer; K Ringe; U Ritterbusch; E Rummeny; P Schirmacher; H J Schlitt; K Schlottmann; V Schmitz; A Schuler; H Schulze-Bergkamen; D von Schweinitz; D Seehofer; H Sitter; C P Straßburg; C Stroszczynski; D Strobel; A Tannapfel; J Trojan; I van Thiel; A Vogel; F Wacker; H Wedemeyer; H Wege; A Weinmann; C Wittekind; B Wörmann; C J Zech Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Robert Peter Reimer; Nils Große Hokamp; Julius Niehoff; David Zopfs; Simon Lennartz; Mariam Heidar; Roger Wahba; Dirk Stippel; David Maintz; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Christian Wybranski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marieke W J L A E Wertenbroek; Marianne Schepers; Hannetta J Kamminga-Rasker; Jan T Bottema; Anneke C Muller Kobold; Han Roelofsen; Koert P de Jong Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 4.430