| Literature DB >> 18175115 |
Ha T T Phan1, Pieter L Jager, Anne M J Paans, John T M Plukker, M G G Sturkenboom, W J Sluiter, Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Thera P Links.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of iodine-124 (124I)-positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and to compare the 124I-PET imaging results with the 131I whole-body scan (WBS).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18175115 PMCID: PMC2292795 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-007-0660-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Fig. 1The diagram showed a schematic course of the investigations performed 4 months after ablation
Patient characteristics and imaging results
| Pt | Age, sex | TNM | Tgoff (ng/ml) | TSH (mU/l) | 124I-PET | Pt 131I-WBS | Dx 131I-WBS | Validation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59M | pT1N0M1 | 48 | 50 | CV, pelvis +++ | CV, pelvis +++ | CV, pelvis + | MR cv: p, MRI pelvis:p |
| 2 | 67F | fT4N1M1 | 201 | 48 | Neck, thyroid bed +++, lung ++ | Neck, thyroid bed +++ lung ++ | Neck ++ | CT lung: no abnormal lesions, MRI neck: p |
| 3 | 85M | fT4N0M1 | 2.6a | 0.01a | Skull, CV, pelvis +++ | CV+++ | CV + | Skull: p, MR cv: pb |
| 4 | 48F | pT4N1M0 | 49 | 77 | Neck ++ | Neck ++ | - | MRI:neck: p |
| 5 | 74F | pT4N1M0 | <0.30 | 44 | Neck ++ | Neck ++ | - | MRI:neck: p |
| 6 | 74M | fT2N0M1 | 691 | >200 | Neck/SC +++ | Neck/SC, pelvis +++ | - | MRI pelvis: pb |
| 7 | 73F | fT4N1M0 | 105 | 56 | Neck/thyroid bed + | Neck/thyroid bed ++ | - | US neck/FNAC: p |
| 8 | 18F | pT4N1M1 | <0.30 | 51 | Pelvis ++ | Pelvis + | - | MRI pelvis:p |
| 9 | 39M | pT4N1M0 | 85 | 75 | Neck +++ | Neck +++ | - | MRI neck: p |
| 10 | 73F | pT4N1M0 | 3 | 43 | Neck + | - | - | US neck and FNAC: inconclusive, FDG PET: n |
| 11 | 59M | fT3N0M1 | 1680 | 73 | Femur prosthesis ++ | - | - | MRI pelvis/femur : reactive tissue around the femur prosthesis; FDG PET: lesions in costae and pelvis |
| 12 | 73M | pT3N0M1 | <0.30 | 33 | - | skull ++ | - | MRI skull: p, FDG PET: n |
| 13 | 67M | pT4N0M0 | <0.30 | 142 | - | pelvis + | - | X-pelvis: n, bone scan: n |
| 14 | 42F | pT4N1M0 | 15 | 81 | - | - | - | US neck and FNAC: n, FDG PET: n |
| 15 | 49F | pT4N0M0 | 18 | 66 | - | - | - | US neck and FNAC: n, FDG PET: n |
| 16 | 59M | pT4NxM0 | 2.8 | 76 | - | - | - | MRI neck, US neck and FNAC: n, FDG PET: n |
| 17 | 68M | pT2N0M1 | 14 | 44 | - | - | - | US neck/FNAC: n, FDG PET and CT: lung lesions |
| 18 | 79F | fT4NxM0 | 1.6 | 53 | - | - | - | MRI neck: p, US neck: lymph node not accessible for FNA, FDG PET: n |
| 19 | 71F | fT4N0M0 | 0.54 | 36 | - | - | - | - |
| 20 | 37M | pT1N1bM0 | <0.30 | 95 | - | - | - | - |
p Papillar, f follicular, Pt I-WBS post-treatment 131I-WBS, Dx I-WBS diagnostic 131I-WBS, CV cervical vertebrae, SC sternal clavicular, − not visible, + just visible, ++ visible, +++ clearly visible, n negative, p positive, FNAC fine needle aspiration cytology, FDG-PET fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
arhTSH stimulated
bIn these two patients, no additional radiologic imaging of the neck (no. 3) and pelvis (no. 6) was performed to confirm the findings on the PET and 131I-WBS due to poor physical condition and due to the lack curative therapeutic options
Fig. 2This patient (no. 1) showed a clearly visible lesion in the cervical vertebrae on the 124I-PET (a, arrow), comparable with the lesion visible on the post-treatment 131I-WBS (c, arrow). This lesion was vaguely visible on the diagnostic 131I-WBS (b, arrow). Physiologic uptake in the esophagus, gastrointestinal tract and bladder is observed on the 124I-PET
Fig. 3This patient (no. 6) showed a clearly visible lesion in the left lower neck region or on the 124I-PET (a, arrow), comparable with the lesion visible on the post-treatment 131I-WBS (c, arrow). No uptake was observed on the diagnostic 131I-WBS (b)
Fig. 4Clearly, uptake in the right costae (arrow) and left hip is seen on the FDG-PET (c) in patient no. 11, whereas the post-treatment 131I-WBS (a) was negative. The 124I-PET (b) showed only uptake around the femur prosthesis on the right side, which is also observed on the FDG-PET, which could be explained by reactive tissue on the MRI. The complementary uptake of radioiodine and FDG is also known as the flip-flop phenomenon, which was first described by Joensuu and Ahonen [27]