Literature DB >> 1817471

Sampling endocervical cells on cervical smears: a comparison of two instruments used in general practice. Cumbrian Practice Research Group.

.   

Abstract

The Aylesbury spatula and a newer plastic device, the Cervex sampler (Steriseal), have been compared in a prospective study, to assess their ability to obtain endocervical cells on cervical smears taken in general practice. Twelve general practitioners in Cumbria took part in the study each taking equal numbers of smears from women with the Aylesbury spatula and the Cervex sampler. On average each practice took 20 smears with each instrument. All women attending for cervical smears for whatever reason were included in the study. Endocervical cells were reported in 62.8% of smears taken with the Aylesbury spatula and in 78.2% taken with the Cervex sampler (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.41). Increasing the percentage of smears which contain endocervical cells by using the Cervex sampler would reduce the number of repeat tests needed. This would cut down anxiety and inconvenience for the patient, and reduce costs for the health service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1817471      PMCID: PMC1371654     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.

Authors:  M E Boon; J C de Graaff Guilloud; W J Rietveld
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.319

2.  Endocervical brush device.

Authors:  G P Vooijs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Endocervical cells in cervical smears.

Authors:  B Gondos; D Marshall; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Relationship between the diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities and the composition of cervical smears.

Authors:  P G Vooijs; A Elias; Y van der Graaf; S Veling
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of "cervical smears".

Authors:  J K Frost
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.347

6.  Calculating confidence intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardised ratios and rates.

Authors:  J A Morris; M J Gardner
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-07

7.  Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Rylander
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.

Authors:  S E Greening
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.582

9.  The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes.

Authors:  A Elias; G Linthorst; B Bekker; P G Vooijs
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

10.  Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.

Authors:  M E Boon; J J Alons-van Kordelaar; P E Rietveld-Scheffers
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.