INTRODUCTION: Axillary lymph node status for lymphatic staging in breast cancer is the best prognostic indicator and guides systemic treatment. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a novel, minimally invasive technique for lymphatic staging proven to improve quality of life. The accurate detection of the SLN is paramount for the success of the procedure. METHODS: Relevant literature was reviewed with regards to the different dyes and techniques used for the detection of SLN in breast cancer. RESULTS: Highest identification rates and lowest false negative rates are achieved by using the combined blue dye and radiocolloid technique with pre-operative imaging using a gamma camera. There is a well-recognized learning curve to successfully perform SLN biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of SLN has been well validated and is the standard of care in early breast cancer. A multidisciplinary approach and structured training is the key to the successful introduction of the technique.
INTRODUCTION: Axillary lymph node status for lymphatic staging in breast cancer is the best prognostic indicator and guides systemic treatment. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a novel, minimally invasive technique for lymphatic staging proven to improve quality of life. The accurate detection of the SLN is paramount for the success of the procedure. METHODS: Relevant literature was reviewed with regards to the different dyes and techniques used for the detection of SLN in breast cancer. RESULTS: Highest identification rates and lowest false negative rates are achieved by using the combined blue dye and radiocolloid technique with pre-operative imaging using a gamma camera. There is a well-recognized learning curve to successfully perform SLN biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of SLN has been well validated and is the standard of care in early breast cancer. A multidisciplinary approach and structured training is the key to the successful introduction of the technique.
Authors: Heechul Yoon; Steven K Yarmoska; Alexander S Hannah; Changhan Yoon; Kristina A Hallam; Stanislav Y Emelianov Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Maria Evertsson; Pontus Kjellman; Magnus Cinthio; Roger Andersson; Thuy A Tran; Rene In't Zandt; Gustav Grafström; Hanna Toftevall; Sarah Fredriksson; Christian Ingvar; Sven-Erik Strand; Tomas Jansson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Thalia Petropoulou; Antonia Kapoula; Aikaterini Mastoraki; Aikaterini Politi; Eleni Spanidou-Karvouni; Ioannis Psychogios; Ioannis Vassiliou; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2017-05-05
Authors: Elnaz Yaghini; Helen D Turner; Alix M Le Marois; Klaus Suhling; Imad Naasani; Alexander J MacRobert Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 12.479