Literature DB >> 18172878

Comparison of dose responses and resistance ratios in four populations of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), to 20 insecticides.

Yue Ping He1, Cong Fen Gao, Wen Ming Chen, Li Qin Huang, Wei Jun Zhou, Xu Gan Liu, Jin Liang Shen, Yu Cheng Zhu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chemical control is a major strategy for suppressing the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker). Owing to their high toxicity and increasing resistance development in the target insect, many insecticides will be phased out entirely in 2007 in China. Alternatives with relatively low toxicity are urgently needed to replace traditional chemicals for rice stem borer control. In this study, the authors examined four field populations of C. suppressalis for their toxicological responses to more than 20 insecticides, including a few low-toxicity organophosphates and many novel pesticides. Interpopulation resistance levels to 12 conventional insecticides were also compared.
RESULTS: Based on LD(50) values, the rice stem borer was most sensitive to avermectins and fipronil (LD(50) < 1 ng larva(-1)). The stem borers exhibited the least sensitivity to endosulfan (LD(50) > 100 ng larva(-1)) and monosultap (LD(50) > 1000 ng larva(-1)). Insect growth regulators and chitin synthase inhibitors showed great efficacy against C. suppressalis, especially against populations that had developed resistance to conventional insecticides. Four field populations showed variable tolerance levels to many insecticides. LYG05 was the most susceptible population, only with a low level of resistance to monosultap (RR = 6.6). NC05 and GL05 populations exhibited intermediate tolerance levels with RR values up to 20.4 and 52.8 respectively. RA05 was the most resistant population to many insecticides, with resistance ratios up to 76.2.
CONCLUSION: The results from this study provide valuable information for selection and adoption of new alternative insecticides and for resistance management of the rice stem borer. (c) 2008 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172878     DOI: 10.1002/ps.1522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  5 in total

1.  Morphological and phylogenetic analysis of a microsporidium (Nosema sp.) isolated from rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Dongxu Xing; Qiong Yang; Sentai Liao; Lanzhi Han; Qingrong Li; Chaoyi Zhao; Yang Xiao; Mingqiang Ye
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The effect of silencing 20E biosynthesis relative genes by feeding bacterially expressed dsRNA on the larval development of Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Yong-Cheng Dong; Ping Li; Chang-Ying Niu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Silicon-mediated multiple interactions: Simultaneous induction of rice defense and inhibition of larval performance and insecticide tolerance of Chilo suppressalis by sodium silicate.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Rongrong Xue; Xueyang Ju; Hui Yan; Zhou Gao; Mohammed Esmail Abdalla Elzaki; Lin Hu; Rensen Zeng; Yuanyuan Song
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Parasitization by Cotesia chilonis influences gene expression in fatbody and hemocytes of Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Shun-Fan Wu; Fang-Da Sun; Yi-Xiang Qi; Yao Yao; Qi Fang; Jia Huang; David Stanley; Gong-Yin Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates.

Authors:  L W Pisa; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; C A Downs; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; M McField; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; J Settele; N Simon-Delso; J D Stark; J P Van der Sluijs; H Van Dyck; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.