OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) between primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the relationship between FA and disease progression using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). METHODS: Two scanners at two different sites were used. Differences in FA between ALS patients and controls scanned in London were investigated. From the results of this analysis, brain regions were selected to test for (i) differences in FA between controls, patients with ALS and patients with PLS scanned in Oxford and (ii) the relationship between FA and disease progression rate in the Oxford patient groups. RESULTS: London ALS patients showed a lower FA than controls in several brain regions. Oxford patients with PLS showed a lower FA than ALS patients and than controls in the body of the corpus callosum and in the white matter adjacent to the right primary motor cortex (PMC), while ALS patients showed reduced FA compared with PLS patients in the white matter adjacent to the superior frontal gyrus. Significant correlations were found between disease progression rate and (i) FA in the white matter adjacent to the PMC in PLS, and (ii) FA along the cortico-spinal tract and in the body of the corpus callosum in ALS. CONCLUSIONS: We described significant FA changes between PLS and ALS, suggesting that these two presentations of motor neuron disease show different features. The significant correlation between FA and disease progression rate in PLS suggests the tissue damage reflected in FA changes contributes to the disease progression rate.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) between primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and the relationship between FA and disease progression using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). METHODS: Two scanners at two different sites were used. Differences in FA between ALS patients and controls scanned in London were investigated. From the results of this analysis, brain regions were selected to test for (i) differences in FA between controls, patients with ALS and patients with PLS scanned in Oxford and (ii) the relationship between FA and disease progression rate in the Oxford patient groups. RESULTS: London ALS patients showed a lower FA than controls in several brain regions. Oxford patients with PLS showed a lower FA than ALS patients and than controls in the body of the corpus callosum and in the white matter adjacent to the right primary motor cortex (PMC), while ALS patients showed reduced FA compared with PLS patients in the white matter adjacent to the superior frontal gyrus. Significant correlations were found between disease progression rate and (i) FA in the white matter adjacent to the PMC in PLS, and (ii) FA along the cortico-spinal tract and in the body of the corpus callosum in ALS. CONCLUSIONS: We described significant FA changes between PLS and ALS, suggesting that these two presentations of motor neuron disease show different features. The significant correlation between FA and disease progression rate in PLS suggests the tissue damage reflected in FA changes contributes to the disease progression rate.
Authors: O Ciccarelli; T E Behrens; D R Altmann; R W Orrell; R S Howard; H Johansen-Berg; D H Miller; P M Matthews; A J Thompson Journal: Brain Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Klaus Schmierer; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Phil A Boulby; Francesco Scaravilli; Daniel R Altmann; Gareth J Barker; Paul S Tofts; David H Miller Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-12-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: F Agosta; A Chiò; M Cosottini; N De Stefano; A Falini; M Mascalchi; M A Rocca; V Silani; G Tedeschi; M Filippi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Cirillo; F Esposito; G Tedeschi; G Caiazzo; A Sagnelli; G Piccirillo; R Conforti; F Tortora; M R Monsurrò; S Cirillo; F Trojsi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christina Schuster; Elisabeth Kasper; Judith Machts; Daniel Bittner; Jörn Kaufmann; Reiner Benecke; Stefan Teipel; Stefan Vielhaber; Johannes Prudlo Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Alexander Unrath; Hans-Peter Müller; Axel Riecker; Albert C Ludolph; Anne-Dorte Sperfeld; Jan Kassubek Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Caroline A Sage; Wim Van Hecke; Ronald Peeters; Jan Sijbers; Wim Robberecht; Paul Parizel; Guy Marchal; Alexander Leemans; Stefan Sunaert Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038