BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of redo-endorectal pull through in Hirschsprung's disease following different original pull through procedures. In the past, redo-endorectal pull through was mainly performed following endorectal pull through, but not following the Duhamel procedure. We present the outcome of eight patients after redo-endorectal pull through, including five who underwent Duhamel pull through as original procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2004, eight patients underwent redo-endorectal pull through following the Duhamel procedure (five), Rehbein procedure (one) and endorectal pull through (two). A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the clinical course after redo-endorectal pull through, reviewing inpatients' and outpatients' charts and performing standardised interviews. RESULTS: Four of eight patients had normal stool pattern after redo-endorectal pull through. In two patients mild and in another two patients severe chronic constipation occurred after redo-surgery. Constipation-associated incontinence was noted in four patients, which is terminated after initiation of laxative treatment in three. Enterocolitis occurred in one patient and recurrent ileitis in another child with total colonic aganglionosis. No impairment of bladder function was observed after redo-endorectal pull through. CONCLUSION: Redo-endorectal pull through proved to be a safe technique and feasible even after prior Duhamel pull through, resulting in good clinical outcome.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse the outcome of redo-endorectal pull through in Hirschsprung's disease following different original pull through procedures. In the past, redo-endorectal pull through was mainly performed following endorectal pull through, but not following the Duhamel procedure. We present the outcome of eight patients after redo-endorectal pull through, including five who underwent Duhamel pull through as original procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2004, eight patients underwent redo-endorectal pull through following the Duhamel procedure (five), Rehbein procedure (one) and endorectal pull through (two). A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the clinical course after redo-endorectal pull through, reviewing inpatients' and outpatients' charts and performing standardised interviews. RESULTS: Four of eight patients had normal stool pattern after redo-endorectal pull through. In two patients mild and in another two patients severe chronic constipation occurred after redo-surgery. Constipation-associated incontinence was noted in four patients, which is terminated after initiation of laxative treatment in three. Enterocolitis occurred in one patient and recurrent ileitis in another child with total colonic aganglionosis. No impairment of bladder function was observed after redo-endorectal pull through. CONCLUSION: Redo-endorectal pull through proved to be a safe technique and feasible even after prior Duhamel pull through, resulting in good clinical outcome.
Authors: Marc Benninga; David C A Candy; Anthony G Catto-Smith; Graham Clayden; Vera Loening-Baucke; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Samuel Nurko; Annamaria Staiano Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Kristiina Kyrklund; Cornelius E J Sloots; Ivo de Blaauw; Kristin Bjørnland; Udo Rolle; Duccio Cavalieri; Paola Francalanci; Fabio Fusaro; Annette Lemli; Nicole Schwarzer; Francesco Fascetti-Leon; Nikhil Thapar; Lars Søndergaard Johansen; Dominique Berrebi; Jean-Pierre Hugot; Célia Crétolle; Alice S Brooks; Robert M Hofstra; Tomas Wester; Mikko P Pakarinen Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 4.123