INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) can detect in vivo axonal damage in the corticopontocerebellar pathway of patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease. METHODS: Conventional MRI and DTI were performed on 18 patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease and 28 age-matched control subjects. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and the mean diffusivity (MD) were measured in the ventral, central, and dorsal pons, middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) and internal capsule to evaluate corticopontocerebellar projection. Changes in FA and MD values were compared between patients and controls. Clinical disability was assessed according to the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). The relationship between DTI measurements and ICARS was studied. Follow-up MRI was performed in five patients approximately 1 year later. RESULTS: FA values were significantly lower in the ventral and central portions of the pons, MCP, and internal capsules than in these areas in control subjects (P < 0.05) with the lower FA values correlating with poorer ICARS (r > -0.57, P < 0.05). MD values were elevated in these areas, but the differences were smaller than for the FA values. No relationship was observed between the MD and ICARS. In the five patients who underwent the follow-up study, there were significant decreases between the initial study and the follow-up DTI study for FA in the MCP and internal capsule (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DTI can demonstrate a degenerated corticopontocerebellar pathway in patients, and FA values can be correlated with ataxia severity. DTI may be a clinically useful tool as a quantitative surrogate marker for monitoring disease progression.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine whether diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) can detect in vivo axonal damage in the corticopontocerebellar pathway of patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease. METHODS: Conventional MRI and DTI were performed on 18 patients with adult-onset ataxic neurodegenerative disease and 28 age-matched control subjects. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and the mean diffusivity (MD) were measured in the ventral, central, and dorsal pons, middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) and internal capsule to evaluate corticopontocerebellar projection. Changes in FA and MD values were compared between patients and controls. Clinical disability was assessed according to the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). The relationship between DTI measurements and ICARS was studied. Follow-up MRI was performed in five patients approximately 1 year later. RESULTS: FA values were significantly lower in the ventral and central portions of the pons, MCP, and internal capsules than in these areas in control subjects (P < 0.05) with the lower FA values correlating with poorer ICARS (r > -0.57, P < 0.05). MD values were elevated in these areas, but the differences were smaller than for the FA values. No relationship was observed between the MD and ICARS. In the five patients who underwent the follow-up study, there were significant decreases between the initial study and the follow-up DTI study for FA in the MCP and internal capsule (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DTI can demonstrate a degenerated corticopontocerebellar pathway in patients, and FA values can be correlated with ataxia severity. DTI may be a clinically useful tool as a quantitative surrogate marker for monitoring disease progression.
Authors: C M Ellis; A Simmons; D K Jones; J Bland; J M Dawson; M A Horsfield; S C Williams; P N Leigh Journal: Neurology Date: 1999-09-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: G Tedeschi; A Bertolino; S G Massaquoi; G Campbell; N J Patronas; S Bonavita; A S Barnett; J R Alger; M Hallett Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Colin Reveley; Anil K Seth; Carlo Pierpaoli; Afonso C Silva; David Yu; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Frank Q Ye Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael N Rozenfeld; Alexander J Nemeth; Matthew T Walker; Prasoon Mohan; Xue Wang; Todd B Parrish; Puneet Opal Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Tanja Schneider; Götz Thomalla; Einar Goebell; Anna Piotrowski; David Mark Yousem Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Stuart Currie; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Ian J Craven; Iain D Wilkinson; Paul D Griffiths; Nigel Hoggard Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Thomas Duning; Michael Deppe; Eva Brand; Jörg Stypmann; Charlotte Becht; Anna Heidbreder; Peter Young Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ishani Sahama; Kate Sinclair; Simona Fiori; James Doecke; Kerstin Pannek; Lee Reid; Martin Lavin; Stephen Rose Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 4.881