PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether it is possible to achieve truly systemic delivery of oncolytic reovirus, in immunocompetent hosts, using cyclophosphamide to overcome some of the barriers to effective intratumoral delivery and replication of i.v. injected virus. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: I.v. delivery of reovirus was combined with different regimens of i.p. administered cyclophosphamide in C57Bl/6 mice bearing established s.c. B16 tumors. Intratumoral viral replication, tumor size, and survival were measured along with levels of neutralizing antibody (NAb) in the blood. Finally, differential toxicities of the virus/cyclophosphamide regimens were monitored through viral replication in systemic organs, survival, and cardiac damage. RESULTS: Repeated i.v. injection of reovirus was poorly effective at seeding intratumoral viral replication/oncolysis. However, by combining i.v. virus with cyclophosphamide, viral titers of between 10(7) and 10(8) plaque-forming units per milligram were recovered from regressing tumors. Doses of cyclophosphamide that ablated NAb were associated with severe toxicities, characterized by viral replication in systemic organs--toxicities that are mirrored by repeated reovirus injections into B-cell knockout mice. Next, we restructured the dosing of cyclophosphamide and i.v. virus such that a dose of 3 mg cyclophosphamide was administered 24 h before reovirus injection, and this schedule was repeated every 6 days. Using this protocol, high levels of intratumoral viral access and replication ( approximately 10(7) plaque-forming units per milligram tumor) were maintained along with systemically protective levels of NAb and only very mild, non-life-threatening toxicity. CONCLUSION: NAb to oncolytic viruses play a dual role in the context of systemic viral delivery; on one hand, they hinder repeated administration of virus but on the other, they provide an important safety mechanism by which virus released from vigorous intratumoral replication is neutralized before it can disseminate and cause toxicity. These data support the use of cyclophosphamide to modulate, but not ablate, patient NAb, in development of carefully controlled clinical trials of the systemic administration of oncolytic viruses.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether it is possible to achieve truly systemic delivery of oncolytic reovirus, in immunocompetent hosts, using cyclophosphamide to overcome some of the barriers to effective intratumoral delivery and replication of i.v. injected virus. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: I.v. delivery of reovirus was combined with different regimens of i.p. administered cyclophosphamide in C57Bl/6 mice bearing established s.c. B16 tumors. Intratumoral viral replication, tumor size, and survival were measured along with levels of neutralizing antibody (NAb) in the blood. Finally, differential toxicities of the virus/cyclophosphamide regimens were monitored through viral replication in systemic organs, survival, and cardiac damage. RESULTS: Repeated i.v. injection of reovirus was poorly effective at seeding intratumoral viral replication/oncolysis. However, by combining i.v. virus with cyclophosphamide, viral titers of between 10(7) and 10(8) plaque-forming units per milligram were recovered from regressing tumors. Doses of cyclophosphamide that ablated NAb were associated with severe toxicities, characterized by viral replication in systemic organs--toxicities that are mirrored by repeated reovirus injections into B-cell knockout mice. Next, we restructured the dosing of cyclophosphamide and i.v. virus such that a dose of 3 mg cyclophosphamide was administered 24 h before reovirus injection, and this schedule was repeated every 6 days. Using this protocol, high levels of intratumoral viral access and replication ( approximately 10(7) plaque-forming units per milligram tumor) were maintained along with systemically protective levels of NAb and only very mild, non-life-threatening toxicity. CONCLUSION: NAb to oncolytic viruses play a dual role in the context of systemic viral delivery; on one hand, they hinder repeated administration of virus but on the other, they provide an important safety mechanism by which virus released from vigorous intratumoral replication is neutralized before it can disseminate and cause toxicity. These data support the use of cyclophosphamide to modulate, but not ablate, patient NAb, in development of carefully controlled clinical trials of the systemic administration of oncolytic viruses.
Authors: Yuval Shaked; Urban Emmenegger; Giulio Francia; Limor Chen; Christina R Lee; Shan Man; Armen Paraghamian; Yaacov Ben-David; Robert S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nelson C Di Paolo; Sebastian Tuve; Shaoheng Ni; Karl Erik Hellström; Ingegerd Hellström; André Lieber Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Giulia Fulci; Laura Breymann; Davide Gianni; Kazuhiko Kurozomi; Sarah S Rhee; Jianhua Yu; Balveen Kaur; David N Louis; Ralph Weissleder; Michael A Caligiuri; E Antonio Chiocca Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M E Christine Lutsiak; Roshanak T Semnani; Roberto De Pascalis; Syed V S Kashmiri; Jeffrey Schlom; Helen Sabzevari Journal: Blood Date: 2004-12-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Marc Beyer; Matthias Kochanek; Kamruz Darabi; Alexey Popov; Markus Jensen; Elmar Endl; Percy A Knolle; Roman K Thomas; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Svenja Debey; Michael Hallek; Joachim L Schultze Journal: Blood Date: 2005-05-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Steve D Loken; Kara Norman; Kensuke Hirasawa; Michael Nodwell; Wanda M Lester; Douglas J Demetrick Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Charles Comins; James Spicer; Andrew Protheroe; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Christine M White; Richard Vile; Alan Melcher; Matt C Coffey; Karl L Mettinger; Gerard Nuovo; David E Cohn; Mitch Phelps; Kevin J Harrington; Hardev S Pandha Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karishma Rajani; Christopher Parrish; Timothy Kottke; Jill Thompson; Shane Zaidi; Liz Ilett; Kevin G Shim; Rosa-Maria Diaz; Hardev Pandha; Kevin Harrington; Matt Coffey; Alan Melcher; Richard Vile Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: E Anders Kolb; Valerie Sampson; Deborah Stabley; Alexa Walter; Katia Sol-Church; Timothy Cripe; Pooja Hingorani; Charlotte Hsieh Ahern; Brenda J Weigel; James Zwiebel; Susan M Blaney Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Eleni M Karapanagiotou; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Mercel Ball; Maryanne Tanay; Chris Nutting; Kate Newbold; Martin E Gore; James Larkin; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Matt Coffey; Brad Thompson; Karl Mettinger; Richard G Vile; Hardev S Pandha; Geoff D Hall; Alan A Melcher; John Chester; Kevin J Harrington Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge; Jianhua Yu; Richard Price; Min Wei; Yan Wang; Michal O Nowicki; Yoonhee P Ha; Stephen Bergin; Christine Hwang; Soledad A Fernandez; Balveen Kaur; Michael A Caligiuri; E Antonio Chiocca Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Candice Willmon; Rosa M Diaz; Phonphimon Wongthida; Feorillo Galivo; Timothy Kottke; Jill Thompson; Steven Albelda; Kevin Harrington; Alan Melcher; Richard Vile Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Timothy Kottke; Jill Thompson; Rosa Maria Diaz; Jose Pulido; Candice Willmon; Matt Coffey; Peter Selby; Alan Melcher; Kevin Harrington; Richard G Vile Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531