Literature DB >> 18172141

Tobacco control success versus demographic destiny: examining the causes of the low smoking prevalence in California.

Kenneth E Warner1, David Mendez, Omar Alshanqeety.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of demographics on California's low smoking prevalence. We estimated that if the United States had the same demographics as California, then the US adult smoking prevalence in 2005 would have been 19.3%, 1.6 percentage points lower than the reported 20.9% for the United States, but 4.1 percentage points higher than California's prevalence of 15.2% in 2005. Tobacco control appears to be a much more important factor than demographics in determining California's low smoking rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18172141      PMCID: PMC2376878          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.112318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  4 in total

1.  State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adults and secondhand smoke rules and policies in homes and workplaces--United States, 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Tobacco use among adults--United States, 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking?

Authors:  J P Pierce; E A Gilpin; S L Emery; M M White; B Rosbrook; C C Berry; A J Farkas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-09-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during California's comprehensive tobacco control programme?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Gilpin; Karen Messer; Martha M White; John P Pierce
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.552

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Small area estimates reveal high cigarette smoking prevalence in low-income cities of Los Angeles county.

Authors:  Yan Cui; Susie B Baldwin; Amy S Lightstone; Margaret Shih; Hongjian Yu; Steven Teutsch
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Accuracy and importance of projections from a dynamic simulation model of smoking prevalence in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth E Warner; David Méndez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Host society acculturation and health practices and outcomes in the United States: public health policy and research implications worldwide.

Authors:  Valentina A Andreeva; Jennifer B Unger
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  Trends in the genetic influences on smoking.

Authors:  Jason D Boardman; Casey L Blalock; Fred C Pampel
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2010-03

5.  Crossing a border for a low-cost, high-risk environment: smoking status and excessive drinking among young adults in Tijuana.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mumford; Joe G Gitchell; Tara Kelley-Baker; Eduardo Romano
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  An evaluation of the California community intervention.

Authors:  Mary V Modayil; David W Cowling; Hao Tang; April Roeseler
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Changes in smoking-related norms in bars resulting from California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act.

Authors:  Travis D Satterlund; Juliet P Lee; Roland S Moore
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2012

8.  Impact of Broadened Coverage of Smoking Cessation Treatments on Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Paul A Fishman
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep       Date:  2012-12-01

9.  Using a cessation-related outcome index to assess California's cessation progress at the population level.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Erin Abramsohn; Hye-Youn Park; David W Cowling; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.