PURPOSE: It is well documented that grafting of cells in the subretinal space of Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats limits deterioration of vision and loss of photoreceptors if performed early in postnatal life. What is unclear is whether cells introduced later, when photoreceptor degeneration is already advanced, can still be effective. This possibility was examined in the present study, using the human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, ARPE-19. METHODS: Dystrophic RCS rats (postnatal day [P] 60) received subretinal injection of ARPE-19 cells (2 x 10(5)/3 microL/eye). Spatial frequency was measured by recording optomotor responses at P100 and P150, and luminance threshold responses were recorded from the superior colliculus at P150. Retinas were stained with cresyl violet, retinal cell-specific markers, and a human nuclear marker. Control animals were injected with medium alone. Animals comparably treated with grafts at P21 were available for comparison. All animals were treated with immunosuppression. RESULTS: Later grafts preserved both spatial frequency and threshold responses over the control and delayed photoreceptor degeneration. There were two to three layers of rescued photoreceptors even at P150, compared with a scattered single layer in sham and untreated control retinas. Retinal cell marker staining showed an orderly array of the inner retinal lamination. The morphology of the second-order neurons was better preserved around the grafted area than in regions distant from graft. Sham injection had little effect in rescuing the photoreceptors. CONCLUSIONS: RPE cell line transplants delivered later in the course of degeneration can preserve not only the photoreceptors and inner retinal lamination but also visual function in RCS rats. However, early intervention can achieve better rescue.
PURPOSE: It is well documented that grafting of cells in the subretinal space of Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats limits deterioration of vision and loss of photoreceptors if performed early in postnatal life. What is unclear is whether cells introduced later, when photoreceptor degeneration is already advanced, can still be effective. This possibility was examined in the present study, using the human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, ARPE-19. METHODS: Dystrophic RCS rats (postnatal day [P] 60) received subretinal injection of ARPE-19 cells (2 x 10(5)/3 microL/eye). Spatial frequency was measured by recording optomotor responses at P100 and P150, and luminance threshold responses were recorded from the superior colliculus at P150. Retinas were stained with cresyl violet, retinal cell-specific markers, and a human nuclear marker. Control animals were injected with medium alone. Animals comparably treated with grafts at P21 were available for comparison. All animals were treated with immunosuppression. RESULTS: Later grafts preserved both spatial frequency and threshold responses over the control and delayed photoreceptor degeneration. There were two to three layers of rescued photoreceptors even at P150, compared with a scattered single layer in sham and untreated control retinas. Retinal cell marker staining showed an orderly array of the inner retinal lamination. The morphology of the second-order neurons was better preserved around the grafted area than in regions distant from graft. Sham injection had little effect in rescuing the photoreceptors. CONCLUSIONS: RPE cell line transplants delivered later in the course of degeneration can preserve not only the photoreceptors and inner retinal lamination but also visual function in RCS rats. However, early intervention can achieve better rescue.
Authors: Biju B Thomas; Danhong Zhu; Tai-Chi Lin; Young Chang Kim; Magdalene J Seiler; Juan Carlos Martinez-Camarillo; Bin Lin; Yousuf Shad; David R Hinton; Mark S Humayun Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jonathan G Swoboda; Jimmy Elliott; Vishal Deshmukh; Lorenzo de Lichtervelde; Weijun Shen; Matthew S Tremblay; Eric C Peters; Charles Y Cho; Bin Lu; Sergej Girman; Shaomei Wang; Peter G Schultz Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Lyndon da Cruz; Kate Fynes; Odysseas Georgiadis; Julie Kerby; Yvonne H Luo; Ahmad Ahmado; Amanda Vernon; Julie T Daniels; Britta Nommiste; Shazeen M Hasan; Sakina B Gooljar; Amanda-Jayne F Carr; Anthony Vugler; Conor M Ramsden; Magda Bictash; Mike Fenster; Juliette Steer; Tricia Harbinson; Anna Wilbrey; Adnan Tufail; Gang Feng; Mark Whitlock; Anthony G Robson; Graham E Holder; Mandeep S Sagoo; Peter T Loudon; Paul Whiting; Peter J Coffey Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Shaomei Wang; Sergej Girman; Bin Lu; Nicholas Bischoff; Toby Holmes; Rebecca Shearer; Lynda S Wright; Clive N Svendsen; David M Gamm; Raymond D Lund Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.799