Literature DB >> 18171705

Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex.

Joakim Vinberg1, Kalanit Grill-Spector.   

Abstract

The lateral occipital complex (LOC) responds preferentially to objects compared with random stimuli or textures independent of the visual cue. However, it is unknown whether the LOC (or other cortical regions) are involved in the processing of edges or global surfaces without shape information. Here, we examined processing of 1) global shape, 2) disconnected edges without a global shape, and 3) global surfaces without edges versus random stimuli across motion and stereo cues. The LOC responded more strongly to global shapes than to edges, surfaces, or random stimuli, for both motion and stereo cues. However, its responses to local edges or global surfaces were not different from random stimuli. This suggests that the LOC processes shapes, not edges or surfaces. LOC also responded more strongly to objects than to holes with the same shape, suggesting sensitivity to border ownership. V7 responded more strongly to edges than to surfaces or random stimuli for both motion and stereo cues, whereas V3a and V4 preferred motion edges. Finally, a region in the caudal intraparietal sulcus (cIPS) responded more strongly to both stereo versus motion and to stereo surfaces versus random stereo (but not to motion surfaces vs. random motion). Thus we found evidence for cue-specific responses to surfaces in the cIPS, both cue-specific and cue-independent responses to edges in intermediate visual areas, and shape-selective responses across multiple cues in the LOC. Overall, these data suggest that integration of visual information across multiple cues is mainly achieved at the level of shape and underscore LOC's role in shape computations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18171705     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01223.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  41 in total

1.  How affordances associated with a distractor object affect compatibility effects: a study with the computational model TRoPICALS.

Authors:  Daniele Caligiore; Anna M Borghi; Domenico Parisi; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Gianluca Baldassarre
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Orientation selectivity of motion-boundary responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Development of population receptive fields in the lateral visual stream improves spatial coding amid stable structural-functional coupling.

Authors:  Jesse Gomez; Alexis Drain; Brianna Jeska; Vaidehi S Natu; Michael Barnett; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dynamics and cortical distribution of neural responses to 2D and 3D motion in human.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Absence of visual experience modifies the neural basis of numerical thinking.

Authors:  Shipra Kanjlia; Connor Lane; Lisa Feigenson; Marina Bedny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex.

Authors:  Johannes Haushofer; Chris I Baker; Margaret S Livingstone; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Representation of cross-frequency spatial phase relationships in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Linda Henriksson; Aapo Hyvärinen; Simo Vanni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

9.  Differential development of the ventral visual cortex extends through adolescence.

Authors:  Golijeh Golarai; Alina Liberman; Jennifer M D Yoon; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Engagement of fusiform cortex and disengagement of lateral occipital cortex in the acquisition of radiological expertise.

Authors:  Erin M Harley; Whitney B Pope; J Pablo Villablanca; Jeanette Mumford; Robert Suh; John C Mazziotta; Dieter Enzmann; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.