Literature DB >> 18167630

A Bayesian approach estimating treatment effects on biomarkers containing zeros with detection limits.

Haitao Chu1, Lei Nie, Thomas W Kensler.   

Abstract

Often in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in occupational and environmental health, a non-negative continuously distributed response variable denoting some metabolites of environmental toxicants is measured in treatment and control groups. When observations occur in both unexposed and exposed subjects, the biomarker measurement can be bimodally distributed with an extra spike at zero reflecting those unexposed. In the presence of left censoring due to values falling below biomarker assay detection limits, those unexposed with true zeros are indistinguishable from those exposed with left-censored values. Since interventions usually do not enhance or eliminate exposure, they do not have any impact on those unexposed. Thus, only the subset of individuals who are exposed should be used to make comparisons to estimate the effect of interventions. In this article, we present Bayesian approaches using non-standard mixture distributions to account for true zeros. The performance of the proposed Bayesian methods is compared with the maximum likelihood methods presented in Chu et al. (Stat. Med. 2005; 24:2053-2067) through simulation studies and a randomized chemoprevention trial conducted in Qidong, People's Republic of China. (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18167630     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  3 in total

1.  Workplace measurements by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1979: descriptive analysis and potential uses for exposure assessment.

Authors:  J Lavoue; M C Friesen; I Burstyn
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-09-05

2.  Empirical constrained Bayes predictors accounting for non-detects among repeated measures.

Authors:  Reneé H Moore; Robert H Lyles; Amita K Manatunga
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison of models for analyzing two-group, cross-sectional data with a Gaussian outcome subject to a detection limit.

Authors:  Ryan E Wiegand; Charles E Rose; John M Karon
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.021

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.