OBJECTIVE: To determine response rate and reduction in tumor burden and effect of dose on tumor response in dogs treated with neoadjuvant prednisone for cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs). DESIGN: Combined prospective clinical study and retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 49 dogs with MCT. PROCEDURES: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for dogs with primary untreated cutaneous MCT managed with neoadjuvant prednisone administration and surgery. Tumor characteristics and response to treatment were recorded. A subset of dogs assigned to low-dose (LD) treatment with neoadjuvant prednisone (1.0 mg/kg [0.45 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) or high-dose (HD) treatment (2.2 mg/kg [1.0 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) was used to determine the effects of dose. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 70% for dogs treated with neoadjuvant prednisone; prednisone dose was not significantly associated with response. Prospectively, the median sum maximal diameter (MaxD) reduction was 45.2%, and reduction in tumor volume was 80.6%. In both treatment groups, the mean percentage MaxD reduction and tumor volume reduction were significant. The difference in response between the LD and HD groups was not significant. The LD group had mean MaxD and tumor volume reductions of 35.4% and 52.5%, respectively, compared with mean reductions of 48.8% in MaxD and 78% in tumor volume in the HD group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment with neoadjuvant prednisone appears to be useful for inducing reduction of MCTs and may facilitate resection when adequate surgical margins cannot be confidently attained because of mass location or size or both.
OBJECTIVE: To determine response rate and reduction in tumor burden and effect of dose on tumor response in dogs treated with neoadjuvant prednisone for cutaneous mast cell tumors (MCTs). DESIGN: Combined prospective clinical study and retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 49 dogs with MCT. PROCEDURES: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for dogs with primary untreated cutaneous MCT managed with neoadjuvant prednisone administration and surgery. Tumor characteristics and response to treatment were recorded. A subset of dogs assigned to low-dose (LD) treatment with neoadjuvant prednisone (1.0 mg/kg [0.45 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) or high-dose (HD) treatment (2.2 mg/kg [1.0 mg/lb], PO, q 24 h) was used to determine the effects of dose. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 70% for dogs treated with neoadjuvant prednisone; prednisone dose was not significantly associated with response. Prospectively, the median sum maximal diameter (MaxD) reduction was 45.2%, and reduction in tumor volume was 80.6%. In both treatment groups, the mean percentage MaxD reduction and tumor volume reduction were significant. The difference in response between the LD and HD groups was not significant. The LD group had mean MaxD and tumor volume reductions of 35.4% and 52.5%, respectively, compared with mean reductions of 48.8% in MaxD and 78% in tumor volume in the HD group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment with neoadjuvant prednisone appears to be useful for inducing reduction of MCTs and may facilitate resection when adequate surgical margins cannot be confidently attained because of mass location or size or both.
Authors: A Lejeune; K Skorupski; S Frazier; I Vanhaezebrouck; R B Rebhun; C M Reilly; C O Rodriguez Journal: Vet Comp Oncol Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 2.613
Authors: Andrigo Barboza de Nardi; Rodrigo Dos Santos Horta; Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves; Felipe Noleto de Paiva; Laís Calazans Menescal Linhares; Bruna Fernanda Firmo; Felipe Augusto Ruiz Sueiro; Krishna Duro de Oliveira; Silvia Vanessa Lourenço; Ricardo De Francisco Strefezzi; Carlos Henrique Maciel Brunner; Marcelo Monte Mor Rangel; Paulo Cesar Jark; Jorge Luiz Costa Castro; Rodrigo Ubukata; Karen Batschinski; Renata Afonso Sobral; Natália Oyafuso da Cruz; Adriana Tomoko Nishiya; Simone Crestoni Fernandes; Simone Carvalho Dos Santos Cunha; Daniel Guimarães Gerardi; Guilherme Sellera Godoy Challoub; Luiz Roberto Biondi; Renee Laufer-Amorim; Paulo Ricardo de Oliveira Paes; Gleidice Eunice Lavalle; Rafael Ricardo Huppes; Fabrizio Grandi; Carmen Helena de Carvalho Vasconcellos; Denner Santos Dos Anjos; Ângela Cristina Malheiros Luzo; Julia Maria Matera; Miluse Vozdova; Maria Lucia Zaidan Dagli Journal: Cells Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 6.600