OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the perceptions of primary care providers about their roles and the challenges of managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and to evaluate differences between providers who serve families primarily from urban versus suburban settings. METHODS: The ADHD Questionnaire was developed to assess primary care provider views about the extent to which clinical activities that are involved in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are appropriate and feasible in primary care. Participants were asked to rate each of 24 items of the questionnaire twice: first to indicate the appropriateness of the activity given sufficient time and resources and second to indicate feasibility in their actual practice. Informants used a 4-point scale to rate each item for appropriateness and feasibility. RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis of primary care provider ratings of the appropriateness of clinical activities for managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder identified 4 factors of clinical practice: factor 1, assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; factor 2, providing mental health care; factor 3, recommending and monitoring approved medications; and factor 4, recommending nonapproved medications. On a 4-point scale (1 = not appropriate to 4 = very appropriate), mean ratings for items on factor 1, factor 2, and factor 3 were high, indicating that the corresponding domains of practice were viewed as highly appropriate. Feasibility challenges were identified on all factors, but particularly factors 1 and 2. A significant interaction effect, indicating differences between appropriateness and feasibility as a function of setting (urban versus suburban), was identified on factor 1. The challenges of assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were greater for urban than for suburban primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers believe that it is highly appropriate for them to have a role in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Feasibility issues were particularly salient related to assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and providing mental health care. The findings highlight the need not only for additional training of primary care providers but also for practice-based resources to assist with school communication and collaboration with mental health agencies, especially in urban practices.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the perceptions of primary care providers about their roles and the challenges of managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and to evaluate differences between providers who serve families primarily from urban versus suburban settings. METHODS: The ADHD Questionnaire was developed to assess primary care provider views about the extent to which clinical activities that are involved in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are appropriate and feasible in primary care. Participants were asked to rate each of 24 items of the questionnaire twice: first to indicate the appropriateness of the activity given sufficient time and resources and second to indicate feasibility in their actual practice. Informants used a 4-point scale to rate each item for appropriateness and feasibility. RESULTS: An exploratory factor analysis of primary care provider ratings of the appropriateness of clinical activities for managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder identified 4 factors of clinical practice: factor 1, assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; factor 2, providing mental health care; factor 3, recommending and monitoring approved medications; and factor 4, recommending nonapproved medications. On a 4-point scale (1 = not appropriate to 4 = very appropriate), mean ratings for items on factor 1, factor 2, and factor 3 were high, indicating that the corresponding domains of practice were viewed as highly appropriate. Feasibility challenges were identified on all factors, but particularly factors 1 and 2. A significant interaction effect, indicating differences between appropriateness and feasibility as a function of setting (urban versus suburban), was identified on factor 1. The challenges of assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were greater for urban than for suburban primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers believe that it is highly appropriate for them to have a role in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Feasibility issues were particularly salient related to assessing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and providing mental health care. The findings highlight the need not only for additional training of primary care providers but also for practice-based resources to assist with school communication and collaboration with mental health agencies, especially in urban practices.
Authors: Jeffery N Epstein; Joshua M Langberg; Philip K Lichtenstein; Rebecca Kolb; Mekibib Altaye; John O Simon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Elizabeth N Allred; Olaf Dammann; Raina N Fichorova; Stephen R Hooper; Scott J Hunter; Robert M Joseph; Karl Kuban; Alan Leviton; Thomas Michael O'Shea; Megan N Scott Journal: J Neuroimmune Pharmacol Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Victor Ede; Martha Okafor; Rosemary Kinuthia; Zena Belay; Teclemichael Tewolde; Ernest Alema-Mensah; David Satcher Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2015-02-07
Authors: Laurie M Douglass; Timothy C Heeren; Carl E Stafstrom; William DeBassio; Elizabeth N Allred; Alan Leviton; T Michael O'Shea; Deborah Hirtz; Julie Rollins; Karl Kuban Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Stephanie L Mayne; Michelle E Ross; Lihai Song; Banita McCarn; Jennifer Steffes; Weiwei Liu; Benyamin Margolis; Romuladus Azuine; Edward Gotlieb; Robert W Grundmeier; Laurel K Leslie; Russell Localio; Richard Wasserman; Alexander G Fiks Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jennifer R Walton; Jennifer A Mautone; Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis; Nathan J Blum; Thomas J Power Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Stephanie L Mayne; Jeremy J Michel; Jeffrey Miller; Manju Abraham; Andrew Suh; Abbas F Jawad; James P Guevara; Robert W Grundmeier; Nathan J Blum; Thomas J Power Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Sandra H Sulzer; Delesha M Carpenter; Catherine Slota; Christopher Gillette; Robyn Sayner; Stephanie Davis; Adrian Sandler Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2013-12-24