Literature DB >> 18166490

Percutaneous closure devices for endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a prospective, non-randomized comparative study.

E Jean-Baptiste1, R Hassen-Khodja, P Haudebourg, P-J Bouillanne, S Declemy, M Batt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe and evaluate our preliminary results with a percutaneous arterial closure device as compared to those obtained with conventional femoral surgical cut down during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2006, 40 of 86 AAA patients selected for endovascular repair met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Nineteen of these patients (Group A) received a bifurcated endograft placed by direct puncture of the femoral arteries (38 femoral triangles) with closure by a Prostar((R)) percutaneous arterial closure device (Abbott). The other 21 patients (control group B) were managed with a bifurcated endograft placed by conventional open surgery (42 femoral triangles). Data concerning all 40 patients were collected prospectively and analyzed.
RESULTS: The technical success rate was 92% (group A) vs 90% (group B), P=0.79. The incidence of perioperative complications was 16% (3/19) in group A and 14% (3/21) in group B (P=0.89). The mean hospital stay was 5.8 days in group A and 7.8 days in group B (P=0.05). The difference in the length of hospitalisation was associated with reduced cost for the percutaneous group (5579.60 euros vs. 7503.60 euros; P=0.04), that counterbalanced the cost induced by the Prostar XL((R)) suture mediated device. Mean follow-up in both groups was 12 months. The overall incidence of locoregional complications after one year of follow-up was 11% (2/19) in group A and 19% (4/21) in group B (P=0.45).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility and safety of total percutaneous endovascular AAA repair. Our preliminary results suggest that the costs paid by healthcare providers for endovascular AAA repair might not be increased with the selective use of percutaneous closure devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18166490     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  12 in total

1.  Current status of percutaneous endografting.

Authors:  Bulent Arslan; Ulku C Turba; Saher Sabri; J Fritz Angle; Alan H Matsumoto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Maintaining a minimally invasive approach-vascular closure after trans-catheter aortic valve intervention.

Authors:  James Cockburn; Adam de Belder; Mike Lewis; Uday Trivedi; David Hildick-Smith
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR.

Authors:  Sergio Petronelli; Maria Teresa Zurlo; Silvia Giambersio; Lucia Danieli; Mariaelena Occhipinti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Eleonora G Karthaus; Peter A Soden; Klaas H J Ultee; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Madelaine Gimzewska; Alexander Ir Jackson; Su Ern Yeoh; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 6.  Fascia Suture Technique and Suture-mediated Closure Devices: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Karaolanis; Ioannis D Kostakis; Demetrios Moris; Viktoria-Varvara Palla; Konstantinos G Moulakakis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Predictors and treatments of Proglide-related complications in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Guohua Hu; Bin Chen; Weiguo Fu; Xin Xu; Daqiao Guo; Junhao Jiang; Jue Yang; Yuqi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A comparison of Percutaneous femoral access in Endovascular Repair versus Open femoral access (PiERO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bastiaan P Vierhout; Ben R Saleem; Alewijn Ott; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Ties D van Andringa de Kempenaer; Maurice E N Pierie; Jan T Bottema; Clark J Zeebregts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Femoral Artery Closure Versus Surgical Cutdown for Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Jianlin Liu; Yanzi Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-05

10.  Comparison of Complication and Success Rates of ProGlide Closure Device in Patients Undergoing TAVI and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Gündüz Durmuş; Erdal Belen; Akif Bayyiğit; Mehmet Mustafa Can
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.