Edwin D Boudreaux1, Sunday Clark, Carlos A Camargo. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ 08103, USA. boudreaux-edwin@cooperhealth.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Planning for emergency department (ED)-initiated interventions for mood disorders requires confirmation of prevalence data, identification of predictors, and an assessment of patient interest in such interventions. METHOD: For two 24-h periods, consecutive patients aged 18+ years presenting to four Boston EDs were enrolled. We collected data on demographics, medical history, psychiatric history, healthcare utilization, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms and interest in hypothetical ED-initiated interventions. Patients with severe illness, altered mental status or severe emotional disturbance were excluded. RESULTS: Of 476 screened patients, 152 (32%; 95% CI, 28-36%) screened positive for depression and 17 (4%; 95% CI, 2-6%) for mania. Depressed patients were more likely than nondepressed patients (all P<.01) to have income <20,000/year (43% vs. 25%), a substance abuse history (19% vs. 5%), a chronic medical condition (67% vs. 53%), use tobacco (42% vs. 22%), have at least one ED visit in the past 6 months (76% vs. 56%) and have at least one hospitalization for substance abuse in the past 6 months (5% vs. 1%). About 50% of patients who screened positive for any mood disorder were interested in at least one ED-based intervention. CONCLUSION: ED patients screening positive for mood disorder symptoms are likely to have complex psychiatric, medical and social histories, which will be necessary to take into account when designing ED-initiated interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Planning for emergency department (ED)-initiated interventions for mood disorders requires confirmation of prevalence data, identification of predictors, and an assessment of patient interest in such interventions. METHOD: For two 24-h periods, consecutive patients aged 18+ years presenting to four Boston EDs were enrolled. We collected data on demographics, medical history, psychiatric history, healthcare utilization, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms and interest in hypothetical ED-initiated interventions. Patients with severe illness, altered mental status or severe emotional disturbance were excluded. RESULTS: Of 476 screened patients, 152 (32%; 95% CI, 28-36%) screened positive for depression and 17 (4%; 95% CI, 2-6%) for mania. Depressedpatients were more likely than nondepressed patients (all P<.01) to have income <20,000/year (43% vs. 25%), a substance abuse history (19% vs. 5%), a chronic medical condition (67% vs. 53%), use tobacco (42% vs. 22%), have at least one ED visit in the past 6 months (76% vs. 56%) and have at least one hospitalization for substance abuse in the past 6 months (5% vs. 1%). About 50% of patients who screened positive for any mood disorder were interested in at least one ED-based intervention. CONCLUSION: ED patients screening positive for mood disorder symptoms are likely to have complex psychiatric, medical and social histories, which will be necessary to take into account when designing ED-initiated interventions.
Authors: David G Beiser; Charlotte E Ward; Milkie Vu; Neda Laiteerapong; Robert D Gibbons Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-04-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Marian E Betz; Sarah A Arias; Daniel L Segal; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Brenda M Booth; Maureen A Walton; Kristin L Barry; Rebecca M Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Frederic C Blow Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Natalie Locci; Erica J Adams; Marian Betz; David B Burmeister; Ted Corbin; Preeti Dalawari; Jeanne L Jacoby; Judith Linden; Jonathan Purtle; Carol North; Debra E Houry Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Gregory Luke Larkin; Annette L Beautrais; Anthony Spirito; Barbara M Kirrane; Melanie J Lippmann; David P Milzman Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Edwin D Boudreaux; Carlos A Camargo; Sarah A Arias; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Amy B Goldstein; Anne P Manton; Janice A Espinola; Ivan W Miller Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Amy B Goldstein; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Anne P Manton; Sarah A Arias; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jeffrey M Caterino; Ashley F Sullivan; Marian E Betz; Janice A Espinola; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.451