Literature DB >> 18164659

Does long-term unilateral deafness change auditory evoked potential asymmetries?

Jemma Hine1, Roger Thornton2, Anne Davis3, Stefan Debener4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term cortical changes in auditory evoked potential (AEP) asymmetries associated with profound unilateral deafness.
METHODS: Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings from 68 channels were used to measure auditory cortex responses to monaural stimulation from 7 unilaterally deaf patients and 7 audiogram-matched controls. Source localization of the AEP N100 response was carried out and regional source waveform amplitude and latency asymmetries were analysed for activity in the N100 latency range and for the middle latency response (MLR) range.
RESULTS: Asymmetry indices (contralateral-ipsilateral)/(contralateral+ipsilateral) showed that matched control subjects, like normally hearing participants, produced activity in the N100 latency range that was more contralaterally dominant for left compared to right ear stimulation. Contrary to expectation, source waveforms and asymmetry indices in the MLR and N100 latency range were similar for unilaterally deaf patients, their matched controls and a group of normally hearing participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Regional source waveform analysis revealed no evidence of systematic cortical changes in hemispheric asymmetries associated with long-term unilateral deafness. It is possible that a reorganization of cortical asymmetries to a 'normal' pattern had taken place in the years between deafness and testing. SIGNIFICANCE: Electrophysiological measures of auditory hemispheric asymmetries do not suggest long-term cortical reorganisation as a result of profound unilateral deafness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18164659     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  8 in total

1.  Early unilateral cochlear implantation promotes mature cortical asymmetries in adolescents who are deaf.

Authors:  Salima Jiwani; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hearing thresholds and FMRI of auditory cortex following eighth cranial nerve surgery.

Authors:  Harold Burton; Jill B Firszt; Timothy Holden
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Functional connectivity alteration of the deprived auditory regions with cognitive networks in deaf and inattentive adolescents.

Authors:  Jianhong Li; Weiwei Men; Jia-Hong Gao; Yang Wang; Xiaoxia Qu; David Chao Dong Zhu; Junfang Xian
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Phillip M Gilley; Anu Sharma; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The effect of long-term unilateral deafness on the activation pattern in the auditory cortices of French-native speakers: influence of deafness side.

Authors:  Julien Hanss; Evelyne Veuillet; Kamel Adjout; Julien Besle; Lionel Collet; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Source-Modeling Auditory Processes of EEG Data Using EEGLAB and Brainstorm.

Authors:  Maren Stropahl; Anna-Katharina R Bauer; Stefan Debener; Martin G Bleichner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Auditory cross-modal reorganization in cochlear implant users indicates audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Maren Stropahl; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.881

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.