Literature DB >> 18164622

Malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinicopathologic and survival characteristics in a consecutive series of 394 patients.

Piero Borasio1, Alfredo Berruti, Andrea Billé, Paolo Lausi, Matteo Giaj Levra, Roberto Giardino, Francesco Ardissone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains disappointing, although recent reports suggest that multimodality therapy including surgery may provide a significant survival benefit. The aims of this single institution study were: to investigate clinicopathologic characteristics and potential prognostic factors in MPM patients, and to ascertain whether surgery followed by adjuvant therapy had an independent prognostic role.
METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively compiled computerized database of all patients with MPM evaluated between 1989 and 2003. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox model were used in the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There were 394 patients: 270 men (68.5%), 124 women, median age 64 (range 28-93). Twenty-seven patients (6.8%) underwent surgical resection (extrapleural pneumonectomy 15, pleurectomy/decortication 12), followed by adjuvant therapy. As of March 2006, 381 patients (96.7%) had died (median survival, 11.7 months; range 0.03-117.9). Median follow-up of 13 surviving patients (3.3%) was 45.2 months (range 28.7-126.5). Overall survival at 2 years was 18.8%. Multimodality therapy including surgery yielded a median survival of 14.5 months and a 2-year survival rate of 29.6%. Using univariate analysis, age (p=0.009), chest pain (p=0.01), weight loss (p=0.001), performance status (p=0.0001), platelet count (p=0.008), histology (p=0.0001), macroscopic appearance of pleural surface (non-specific inflammation, tumor-like thickening, or nodules; p=0.0001), visceral pleura involvement (p=0.0001), degree of involvement of pleural cavity (less than or more than one third of the cavity; p=0.0001), and multimodality therapy (p<0.01) were found to be significant prognostic factors. At multivariate analysis, performance status, platelet count, histology, and degree of involvement of pleural cavity remained independently associated with survival, whereas multimodality therapy failed to enter the model.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant predictors of survival include performance status, platelet count, histology, and degree of involvement of pleural cavity. Within the confines of this retrospective study and the small number of patients undergoing multimodality therapy, the role of surgery in the treatment of MPM remains unclear. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal treatment strategy in this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18164622     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  30 in total

1.  Multicentric study on malignant pleural mesothelioma in Turkey: clinicopathologic and survival characteristics of 282 patients.

Authors:  Emin Tamer Elkiran; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Alper Sevinc; Sercan Aksoy; Umut Demirci; Mesut Seker; Hakan Harputluoglu; Nuriye Yildirim Ozdemir; Feridun Isik; Arife Ulas; Mevlude Inanc; Ulku Yalcintas Arslan; Gamze Gokoz Dogu; Abdurrahman Isikdogan; Suleyman Buyukberber
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Review of malignant pleural mesothelioma survival after talc pleurodesis or surgery.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Maaike van Gerwen; Meredith Mihalopoulos; Gil Moskowitz; Bian Liu; Raja Flores
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Which type of surgery should become the preferred procedure for malignant pleural mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy or extended pleurectomy?

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Bedirhan; Levent Cansever; Adalet Demir; Süleyman Ceyhan; Hasan Akın; Halide Nur Urer; Aysun Olçmen; Celalettin Kocatürk; Ibrahim Dinçer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Overview of treatment related complications in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options.

Authors:  Hassan Lemjabbar-Alaoui; Omer Ui Hassan; Yi-Wei Yang; Petra Buchanan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-08-19

6.  A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Kei Suzuki; Christos Colovos; Camelia S Sima; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Frequent coamplification and cooperation between C-MYC and PVT1 oncogenes promote malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Erick Riquelme; Milind B Suraokar; Jaime Rodriguez; Barbara Mino; Heather Y Lin; David C Rice; Anne Tsao; Ignacio I Wistuba
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of programmed cell death 1-Ligand 1 expression in malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Simone B S P Terra; Aaron S Mansfield; Haidong Dong; Tobias Peikert; Anja C Roden
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 9.  Is there a role for prophylactic radiotherapy to intervention tract sites in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma?

Authors:  Paul Halford; Amelia O Clive
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

10.  Re-evaluation of histological diagnoses of malignant mesothelioma by immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Helmut P Sandeck; Oluf D Røe; Kristina Kjærheim; Helena Willén; Erik Larsson
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.