Literature DB >> 18164533

Time used for ventilation in two-rescuer CPR with a bag-valve-mask device during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Silje Odegaard1, Magnus Pillgram, Nicolas Erlend Vaugelade Berg, Theresa Olasveengen, Jo Kramer-Johansen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Professional rescuers only deliver chest compressions 39% of the available time before intubation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In manikin-studies lay rescuers need approximately 15s to deliver two ventilations. It is not known how much time professional rescuers use for two ventilations and we hypothesised that the time used for two ventilations with a bag-valve-mask device before tracheal intubation is longer than recommended and that the extended time contributes to the high no flow time.
METHODS: Quality of CPR was available for analysis in 628 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the ambulance service in Oslo, Akershus, London, and Stockholm from 2002 to 2005. The 2000 Guidelines were used as the reference. Ventilations were registered from changes in transthoracic impedance as measured through the standard defibrillation pads. We included episodes only with CPR with a 15:2 pattern for at least 1 min and identified all pauses between chest compressions before intubation.
RESULTS: In the remaining 172 episodes we identified 3097 chest compression pauses. In 1587 (51%) of the pauses we identified two ventilations and a mean pause length for each episode was calculated. The median of these means was 5.5s (IQR; 4.5, 7). These pauses comprised a median 9% (IQR; 4%, 15%) of the time before intubation in these episodes. In 892 (29%) of the pauses we identified a different number of ventilations, or other interventions in addition to ventilation. In the remaining 618 pauses (20%) no ventilations were registered.
CONCLUSIONS: Professional rescuers delivered two bag-valve-mask ventilations within the 5-6s as indicated in the 2000 Guidelines, slightly longer than the 3-4s recommended in the 2005 Guidelines. However, only half the pauses were used for two ventilations, and the total time for two ventilations accounted for only 27% of the time without chest compressions. Excessive time for ventilation cannot explain the high no-flow time during CPR by professional rescuers before intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18164533     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  [Modified two-rescuer resuscitation algorithm. Alternative for international missions of the German Armed Forces!].

Authors:  M-M Ventzke; H Gässler; M Brucke; M Helm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Impact of 'synchronous' and 'asynchronous' CPR modality on quality bundles and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  Gianfranco Sanson; Giuseppe Ristagno; Giuseppe Davide Caggegi; Athina Patsoura; Veronica Xu; Marco Zambon; Domenico Montalbano; Sreten Vukanovic; Vittorio Antonaglia
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Association of prehospital airway management technique with survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  Eujene Jung; Young Sun Ro; Hyun Ho Ryu; Sang Do Shin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Does the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application improve confidence in bystanders performing CPR?

Authors:  John Renshaw; Georgette Eaton; Pete Gregory; Tim Kilner
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  A prospective observational study comparing two supraglottic airway devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Maja Pålsdatter Lønvik; Odd Eirik Elden; Mats Joakimsen Lunde; Trond Nordseth; Karin Elvenes Bakkelund; Oddvar Uleberg
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.