Literature DB >> 18164292

Accommodation-induced changes in iris curvature.

Syril Dorairaj1, Cristiano Oliveira, Amanda K Fose, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Celso Tello, Victor H Barocas, Robert Ritch.   

Abstract

Eyes were imaged using anterior segment ultrasound biomicroscopy to compare alterations in iris contour following the onset of accommodation in eyes with narrow angles, pigment dispersion syndrome, and controls. A radial perpendicular image in the horizontal temporal meridian was obtained for one eye while the subject focused on a distant target (~6m, unaccommodated state) with the fellow eye. The subject then focused steadily on a near target (~0.33 m, accommodated state) for 3 min. Images were acquired at 0, 1, 2, and 3 min. Iris curvature was determined by measuring the maximum distance between the posterior iris surface and a line from the iris root to the first point of contact between the iris and lens. In control subjects (n=22), iris curvature decreased immediately after the onset of accommodation, but not significantly (p=0.49), from 246+/-37 microm (mean+/-SEM) to 205+/-82 microm; curvature increased after 3 min of accommodation to 298+/-57 microm (p=0.10 vs. onset of accommodation). Eyes with pigment dispersion syndrome (n=15) exhibited curvatures of 60+/-79 microm when unaccommodated, -3+/-83 microm immediately after accommodation (p=0.12), and 146+/-94 microm (p=0.01) 3 min later. Eyes with narrow angles (n=16) exhibited curvatures of 449+/-45 microm when unaccommodated, 414+/-46 microm immediately after accommodation (p=0.37), and 523+/-40 microm (p<0.01) 3 min later. The results confirm the time-dependent nature of iris contour response, with significant differences observed between the initial observation after accommodation and the observation 3 min later. The largest drop in curvature immediately after accommodation and the most rapid increase in curvature during subsequent observation were seen in the PDS subjects. We suspect that the more rapid increase in curvature in the PDS subjects is due to the elevated anterior chamber pressure caused by the "reverse pupillary block" effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18164292      PMCID: PMC2330199          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  10 in total

1.  Computational evaluation of the role of accommodation in pigmentary glaucoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Heys; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Accommodative microfluctuations and iris contour.

Authors:  Eric C Huang; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  [Posterior iris bowing after accommodation--elucidation of the etiology of pigment dispersion syndrome].

Authors:  J Ueda; S Sawaguchi; J Watanabe; M Shirakashi; H Abe
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1997-02

4.  Pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma: a new mechanism concept, a new treatment, and a new technique.

Authors:  J R Karickhoff
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1992-04

5.  Blinking and iris configuration in PDS.

Authors:  J A McWhae; R L Piemontesi; A C Crichton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Posterior iris bowing in pigmentary dispersion syndrome caused by accommodation.

Authors:  C J Pavlin; K Harasiewicz; F S Foster
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of iris profile changes with accommodation in pigmentary glaucoma and relationship to age.

Authors:  Robert S Adam; Charles J Pavlin; Lawrence J Ulanski
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Accommodation and iridotomy in the pigment dispersion syndrome.

Authors:  C J Pavlin; P Macken; G E Trope; K Harasiewicz; F S Foster
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  1996-02

9.  Prevention of blinking alters iris configuration in pigment dispersion syndrome and in normal eyes.

Authors:  J M Liebmann; C Tello; S J Chew; H Cohen; R Ritch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Measurement of the rate of aqueous humor flow.

Authors:  S D Smith
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Role of lens vault in subtypes of angle closure in Iranian subjects.

Authors:  S Moghimi; Z Vahedian; N Zandvakil; M Mohammdi; G Fakhraie; N Nassiri; A L Coleman; S Lin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Increased iris-lens contact following spontaneous blinking: mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Amini; Sara Jouzdani; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  Noelia Martínez-Albert; Jose J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Quantification of iris concavity.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Amini; Julie E Whitcomb; Tiago S Prata; Syril Dorairaj; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2010-07

5.  Steeper Iris Conicity Is Related to a Shallower Anterior Chamber: The Gutenberg Health Study.

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Norbert Pfeiffer; Stefan Nickels; Andreas Schulz; Philipp S Wild; Maria Blettner; Karl Lackner; Manfred E Beutel; Thomas Münzel; Urs Vossmerbaeumer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Trends in the characteristics of acute primary angle closure in Korea over the past 10-years.

Authors:  Jun Young Ha; Mi Sun Sung; Hwan Heo; Sang Woo Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of Smartphone Use on Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Eun Ji Lee; Hyunjoong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.