Literature DB >> 18164248

Can transgenic mosquitoes afford the fitness cost?

Louis Lambrechts1, Jacob C Koella, Christophe Boëte.   

Abstract

In a recent study, SM1-transgenic Anopheles stephensi, which are resistant partially to Plasmodium berghei, had higher fitness than non-transgenic mosquitoes when they were maintained on Plasmodium-infected blood. This result should be interpreted cautiously with respect to malaria control using transgenic mosquitoes because, despite the evolutionary advantage conferred by the transgene, a concomitant cost prevents it from invading the entire population. Indeed, for the spread of a resistance transgene in a natural situation, the transgene's fitness cost and the efficacy of the gene drive will be more crucial than any evolutionary advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18164248     DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2007.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Parasitol        ISSN: 1471-4922


  22 in total

Review 1.  Safe and fit genetically modified insects for pest control: from lab to field applications.

Authors:  F Scolari; P Siciliano; P Gabrieli; L M Gomulski; A Bonomi; G Gasperi; A R Malacrida
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Semele: a killer-male, rescue-female system for suppression and replacement of insect disease vector populations.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Geoffrey W Pittman; Anna B Buchman; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Novel synthetic Medea selfish genetic elements drive population replacement in Drosophila; a theoretical exploration of Medea-dependent population suppression.

Authors:  Omar S Akbari; Chun-Hong Chen; John M Marshall; Haixia Huang; Igor Antoshechkin; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 4.  Engineering the genomes of wild insect populations: challenges, and opportunities provided by synthetic Medea selfish genetic elements.

Authors:  Bruce A Hay; Chun-Hong Chen; Catherine M Ward; Haixia Huang; Jessica T Su; Ming Guo
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 5.  Gene editing technologies and applications for insects.

Authors:  Valentino M Gantz; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 5.186

Review 6.  Progress towards engineering gene drives for population control.

Authors:  Robyn R Raban; John M Marshall; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Secretion of anti-Plasmodium effector proteins from a natural Pantoea agglomerans isolate by using PelB and HlyA secretion signals.

Authors:  Dawn C Bisi; David J Lampe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparative fitness assessment of Anopheles stephensi transgenic lines receptive to site-specific integration.

Authors:  D A Amenya; M Bonizzoni; A T Isaacs; N Jasinskiene; H Chen; O Marinotti; G Yan; A A James
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 3.585

Review 9.  Malaria vector control: from past to future.

Authors:  Kamaraju Raghavendra; Tapan K Barik; B P Niranjan Reddy; Poonam Sharma; Aditya P Dash
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 10.  Molecular genetic manipulation of vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  Olle Terenius; Osvaldo Marinotti; Douglas Sieglaff; Anthony A James
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 21.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.