Literature DB >> 18164051

Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.

Matthew J German1, Thomas E Carrick, John F McCabe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work was to discern, for elastomeric impression materials, the important rheological properties and importance of hydrophilicity for detail reproduction.
METHODS: Viscosity, modulus and tan delta were measured using a controlled-stress rheometer in cone/plate configuration. The flow of the materials, immediately after mixing and at the manufacturer's stated working time, was measured using a shark fin test and the interaction with moist surfaces was determined by taking impressions from two different sized grooves in moist gypsum casts.
RESULTS: Tan delta was found to be the parameter most indicative of the accuracy of the impression and the flow of the material. Impregum samples, a polyether material, exhibited the highest initial tan delta (7.4), the largest shark fins at both time periods and the most accurate impressions from both grooves. Aquasil, a polyvinylsiloxane material, had similar initial tan delta values (6.9) and impressions taken on the deep groove with this material closely matched the groove. The other two polyvinylsiloxane materials (Affinis and Flexitime) had significantly lower initial tan delta values (3.1 and 2.9, respectively), exhibited much smaller shark fins and a worse ability to accurately reproduce the deep groove. SIGNIFICANCE: For large features, it is clear that the higher the initial tan delta of the impression material the better the ability to replicate larger features. However, with smaller features the relative hydrophobicity of the material becomes an important factor, with more hydrophilic materials better able to reproduce fine detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18164051     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of setting time, tear strength, dimensional stability and antimicrobial property of silver and titanium nanoparticles incorporated elastomeric impression material.

Authors:  Kapoor Abhijeet; J Brintha Jei; K Murugesan; B Muthukumar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-07-19

2.  Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  Lamia Singer; Shaymaa I Habib; Heba El-Amin Shalaby; Sayed H Saniour; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Poly Ether, Vinyl Siloxane, and Vinyl Siloxane Ether Impression Materials: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Shyma Rose; Shyammohan Aravindakshan; Jafar Abdulla Mohamed Usman; Raza Mohamed; Sheethel Menon; Rahmath Shameem Shafiullah; Mahmoud Gamal Salloum
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Comparison of the effect of different medicaments on surface reproduction of two commercially available Polyvinyl Siloxane impression materials - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Rina Singh; Jagjit Singh; Ramandeep S Gambhir; Ramanpreet Singh; Sonia Nanda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-07-01

5.  Mechanical Properties of Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Dino Re; Francesco De Angelis; Gabriele Augusti; Davide Augusti; Sergio Caputi; Maurizio D'Amario; Camillo D'Arcangelo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-11-26

6.  Influence of chloramine-T disinfection on elastomeric impression stability.

Authors:  Ricardo Danil Guiraldo; Sandrine Bittencourt Berger; Marilia Franco Punhagui; Thais Staut Moretto; Murilo Baena Lopes; Alcides Gonini-Júnior; Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

7.  Comparing the Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials in Making Duplicate Dies.

Authors:  Farshad Bajoghli; Mahmoud Sabouhi; Saeid Nosouhian; Amin Davoudi; Zeynab Behnamnia
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

8.  Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers.

Authors:  Seok Woo Chang; Young-Kyu Lee; Qiang Zhu; Won Jun Shon; Woo Cheol Lee; Kee Yeon Kum; Seung Ho Baek; In Bog Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Kwang Shik Bae
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.