OBJECTIVE: The use of glucocorticoids (GCs) in rheumatoid arthritis is limited by side effects related to unfavorable pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Liposomal GC formulations have been studied since the 1970s in an attempt to overcome this obstacle, but none has entered clinical use. We undertook this study to determine whether a novel approach could overcome the limitations that have thus far prevented the clinical use of these formulations: low drug:lipid ratio, low encapsulation efficiency, and lack of controlled release. METHODS: We used approximately 80-nm sterically stabilized (pegylated) nanoliposomes (NSSLs), which were remote-loaded with an amphipathic weak acid GC (such as methyl prednisolone hemisuccinate) utilizing an intraliposome (aqueous compartment)-high/extraliposome (bulk medium)-low transmembrane calcium acetate gradient. This unique method actually "traps" the GC in the liposomal aqueous phase as a calcium-GC precipitate. RESULTS: Our liposome formulation exhibited high encapsulation efficiency (94%) and a high drug:lipid mole ratio (0.41) and demonstrated controlled release of the encapsulated GC during systemic circulation and in inflamed paws in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. In addition, both in arthritic rats and in a Beagle dog, we showed the pharmacokinetic advantage of using liposomes as GC carriers. Finally, we demonstrated the superior therapeutic efficacy of our liposome formulation over that of free GCs in arthritic rats, both in early and in peak disease stages. CONCLUSION: Amphipathic weak acid GCs remote-loaded into approximately 80-nm NSSLs overcome past limitations of liposomal GC formulations. The unique loading method, which also leads to controlled release, improves the therapeutic effect both systemically and locally. Such a development has great potential for improving GC therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The use of glucocorticoids (GCs) in rheumatoid arthritis is limited by side effects related to unfavorable pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. Liposomal GC formulations have been studied since the 1970s in an attempt to overcome this obstacle, but none has entered clinical use. We undertook this study to determine whether a novel approach could overcome the limitations that have thus far prevented the clinical use of these formulations: low drug:lipid ratio, low encapsulation efficiency, and lack of controlled release. METHODS: We used approximately 80-nm sterically stabilized (pegylated) nanoliposomes (NSSLs), which were remote-loaded with an amphipathic weak acid GC (such as methyl prednisolone hemisuccinate) utilizing an intraliposome (aqueous compartment)-high/extraliposome (bulk medium)-low transmembrane calcium acetate gradient. This unique method actually "traps" the GC in the liposomal aqueous phase as a calcium-GC precipitate. RESULTS: Our liposome formulation exhibited high encapsulation efficiency (94%) and a high drug:lipid mole ratio (0.41) and demonstrated controlled release of the encapsulated GC during systemic circulation and in inflamed paws in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. In addition, both in arthritic rats and in a Beagle dog, we showed the pharmacokinetic advantage of using liposomes as GC carriers. Finally, we demonstrated the superior therapeutic efficacy of our liposome formulation over that of free GCs in arthritic rats, both in early and in peak disease stages. CONCLUSION: Amphipathic weak acid GCs remote-loaded into approximately 80-nm NSSLs overcome past limitations of liposomal GC formulations. The unique loading method, which also leads to controlled release, improves the therapeutic effect both systemically and locally. Such a development has great potential for improving GC therapy.
Authors: Yicheng Mao; Georgia Triantafillou; Erin Hertlein; William Towns; Matthew Stefanovski; Xiaokui Mo; David Jarjoura; Mitch Phelps; Guido Marcucci; Ly James Lee; David M Goldenberg; Robert J Lee; John C Byrd; Natarajan Muthusamy Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xin-Ming Liu; Ling-Dong Quan; Jun Tian; Yazen Alnouti; Kai Fu; Geoffrey M Thiele; Dong Wang Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 4.200